CaseNotes LogoCaseNotes
  • Home
  • Library
  • Research
  • Discussion Hub
  • Wiki
  • Latin Dictionary
  • Question Bank
  • Settings
S

Student

Student Account

South African Law • Jurisdictional Corpus
HomeLibraryResearchQuestionsSettings
Judicial Precedent
Ask AI

Trustees of Akasia Body Corporate v FL Tsele and IM Tsele

CitationCSOS010188/GP/23 (CSOS Adjudication Order, 25 March 2024)
JurisdictionZA
Area of Law
Sectional Titles LawCommunity Schemes Law
Free account

Get the most out of this judgment

Create a free CaseNotes account to save this case, see how it's cited, get an AI summary, and search 10,000+ SA judgments.

Create free accountor sign in
Property Law
Financial Levies and Contributions

Facts of the Case

The applicant, the Trustees of Akasia Body Corporate, is the body corporate of a sectional title scheme governed by the Sectional Titles Schemes Management Act 8 of 2011 and the Community Schemes Ombud Service Act 9 of 2011. The first and second respondents, FL Tsele and IM Tsele, are the registered co-owners of section 35 in the scheme. The body corporate alleged that the respondents failed or neglected to pay monthly levies and ancillary charges, including monthly CSOS levies, owed in respect of their unit. The applicant submitted the respondents' statement of account reflecting arrears of R46 354.38. The respondents did not respond to correspondence from CSOS and filed no submissions. The adjudication proceeded on the papers, and the adjudicator also requested further information, after which the applicant submitted the latest levy statement.

Legal Issues

  • Whether the respondents, as co-owners of a unit in the sectional title scheme, were liable to pay the outstanding levies and ancillary charges claimed by the body corporate.
  • Whether the applicant proved on a balance of probabilities that the respondents were indebted in the amount of R46 354.38.
  • Whether relief under section 39(1)(e) of the Community Schemes Ombud Service Act 9 of 2011 should be granted for payment of contributions or other amounts due to the body corporate.
  • What payment terms should be ordered in relation to the arrear levy debt.

Judicial Outcome

The application was granted. The respondents were declared jointly and severally indebted to the applicant in the amount of R46 354.38 for levies and ancillary charges in respect of section 35 as at 25 March 2024. They were ordered to pay the amount in 24 equal monthly instalments of R1 931.43 commencing on 1 April 2024, with subsequent instalments due on the first day of each succeeding month. No interest would accrue during the permitted payment period. The order does not affect the respondents' ongoing obligation to pay regular monthly levies and ancillary charges. If the respondents default on any ordered payment, the full outstanding amount becomes immediately due and payable. No order as to costs was made.

Ratio Decidendi

A body corporate in a sectional title scheme is entitled to recover unpaid levies and ancillary charges from unit owners through section 39(1)(e) of the CSOS Act where it proves the indebtedness on a balance of probabilities. Owners, as members of the body corporate under sections 2(1) and 3(1) of the STSMA, are obliged to make contributions necessary for the body corporate to perform its statutory functions. In the absence of any opposing version, a properly supported statement of account and related documentary evidence can establish such indebtedness.

Obiter Dicta

The adjudicator's remarks that owners who default on levies are effectively subsidised by compliant owners, and that the body corporate cannot perform its functions without owners' contributions, are broader policy observations explaining the importance of levy collection. The reference to the possibility of charging interest under PMR 21(3)(c) was also not decisive because the order expressly suspended interest accrual during the instalment period.

Legal Significance

The decision is significant in the community schemes context because it reinforces the enforceability of body corporate levy obligations through CSOS adjudication under section 39(1)(e) of the CSOS Act. It affirms that sectional owners are obliged to contribute to the financial administration of the scheme and that documentary proof such as a levy statement may suffice, especially where respondents do not dispute the claim. The order also illustrates CSOS's practical remedial flexibility by allowing repayment by instalments while preserving the body corporate's right to immediate payment upon default.

Practice This Case

Sign up to practise IRAC analysis, issue spotting, and argument building on this case.

Explore More Cases

More Sectional Titles Law cases

  • 4-Tune Investments (Pty) Ltd v Kingsgate Body CorporateCSOS 4565/WC/22 (Adjudication Order, 29 November 2023)
  • 9 on Rydal Vale Court Body Corporate v Pan African Holdings Pty LtdCSOS-4563/KZN/23 (Adjudication Order, 8 November 2023)
  • Abrahm Bore v The Trustees of Loeries Park Body CorporateCSOS9164/GP/22 (Adjudication Order, 25 July 2022)
  • Akasia Body Corporate v Matodzi MukwevhoCSOS 10243/GP/23 (Adjudication Order, 11 April 2024)
  • Akasia Body Corporate v RFL RodriquesCSOS 10242/GP/23 (Adjudication Order, 11 April 2024)
  • Akasia Body Corporate v S MahloboCSOS 10249/GP/23 (Adjudication Order, 11 April 2024)
  • Allied Holdings (Pty) Ltd v Trustees of Witfield Ridge Body CorporateCSOS 4861GP23 (Adjudication Order, 14 August 2023)
  • Amanda Gumede v Trustees of Rockway Glen Body CorporateCSOS 1022/GP/23 (Adjudication Order, 25 June 2023)

More South Africa cases

  • 3M South Africa (Pty) Ltd v The Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service(272/09) [2010] ZASCA 20 (23 March 2010)
  • 4 Seasons Logistics CC v Kgotse(1215/2023) [2026] ZASCA 09 (04 February 2026)
  • 4 Seasons Logistics CC v Nicholas Ngwanammoto Kgotse(1215/2023) [2026] ZASCA 09 (4 February 2026)
  • 4-Tune Investments (Pty) Ltd v Kingsgate Body CorporateCSOS 4565/WC/22 (Adjudication Order, 29 November 2023)
  • 68 Wolmarans Street Johannesburg (Pty) Ltd and Others v Tufh Limited(1263/2022) [2024] ZASCA 48 (15 April 2024)
  • 9 on Rydal Vale Court Body Corporate v Pan African Holdings Pty LtdCSOS-4563/KZN/23 (Adjudication Order, 8 November 2023)
  • AAA Investments (Proprietary) Limited v The Micro Finance Regulatory Council and Another
2006 (11) BCLR 1255 (CC) (also reported as CCT 51/05)
  • A A Alloy Foundry (Pty) Limited v Titaco Projects (Pty) LimitedCase No. 309/97