The applicant, Allied Holdings (Pty) Ltd, is the registered owner of sections 44, 152, 155, 158, 182, 182, 193, 194 and 195 in the Witfield Ridge sectional title scheme in Boksburg. The respondent is the trustees of the Witfield Ridge Body Corporate. The applicant brought an urgent application to the Community Schemes Ombud Service (CSOS), alleging that the respondent, or its managing agent De Lucia Properties, had caused the prepaid electricity meters for the applicant’s units to be blocked. As a result, the applicant and the tenants occupying those units were unable to load prepaid electricity or use electricity in the units. CSOS invited the respondent to respond urgently and to reinstate the supply, but no response was received. The matter was then referred directly to urgent adjudication on the papers.
The application was upheld. The respondent was ordered, in terms of section 39(7)(b) of the CSOS Act, to ensure that electricity supply to the applicant’s sections 44, 152, 155, 158, 182, 182, 193, 194 and 195 was reconnected forthwith, no later than 4 p.m. on 15 August 2023, including unblocking and reinstating the prepaid electricity meters so that electricity could be purchased and used. The respondent was ordered not to load anything other than electricity onto the meters, to bear all reconnection costs, and to refrain in future from terminating electricity supply or placing any block or hold on those prepaid meters unless and until it obtained a court order authorising such action. There was no order as to costs.
In a sectional title scheme, the blocking of a prepaid electricity meter so that an owner or occupier cannot purchase or use electricity constitutes unlawful interference with the quasi-possession incidental to occupation of immovable property. Such conduct amounts to impermissible self-help and is remediable by urgent restorative relief under the CSOS framework. A body corporate may not terminate or restrict electricity supply to a section, including by blocking a prepaid meter, for levy arrears or similar reasons unless it has first obtained a court order authorising that step.
The adjudicator stated that the Ombud’s Office has an obligation to uphold the law of the Republic of South Africa and suggested that a failure to do so would constitute a criminal offence and be unconstitutional. The adjudicator also presumed, without evidence from the respondent, that the likely reason for the blocking may have been levy arrears, but noted that this had not been properly placed before the tribunal.
The matter is significant within South African community schemes jurisprudence because it reaffirms that a body corporate cannot resort to self-help by interrupting electricity supply or blocking prepaid meters in order to enforce levy payments or other obligations. It confirms that CSOS adjudicators may grant urgent restorative relief analogous to spoliation where access to electricity in sectional title schemes is unlawfully interfered with. The decision underscores the protection of quasi-possession of electricity supply and the requirement that bodies corporate obtain a court order before any disconnection or blocking of supply.