The applicant, 9 on Rydal Vale Court Body Corporate, brought a dispute-resolution application under section 38 of the Community Schemes Ombud Service Act 9 of 2011 seeking relief under section 39(1)(e) for payment of arrear levies owed by the respondent, Pan African Holdings Pty Ltd, the owner of a unit in the scheme. The body corporate alleged that the respondent had failed to pay monthly levies despite repeated demands, including an SMS, a final notice and a notice of action. The respondent did not dispute non-payment but contended that it was entitled to withhold levies by way of legal set-off because the body corporate allegedly owed it money. The applicant claimed levy arrears of R100 189,05, together with interest, and also sought administration costs. The respondent denied liability for the outstanding levies and interest, asserted that set-off had extinguished the debt, and sought no formal counter-relief.
The relief sought by the applicant was substantially granted. The respondent was declared liable to the applicant in the sum of R100 189,05, inclusive of interest, in respect of levy arrears, and was ordered to pay that amount on or before 30 January 2024. The applicant's claim for administration costs was refused. No order as to costs was made.
A unit owner's liability for levies in a sectional title scheme is an incident of ownership and accrues by operation of the Sectional Titles Schemes Management Act. An owner may not withhold payment of levies on the basis of an alleged debt owed by the body corporate unless the reciprocal claim is liquid, that is, agreed or confirmed by a competent adjudicative forum. In the absence of such liquidity, set-off does not operate against levy obligations, and the body corporate is entitled to recover arrear levies together with duly authorised interest. Administration charges are not recoverable unless specifically authorised by legislation, a judgment or order, or the scheme's rules.
The adjudicator observed that if an owner withholds levies without a liquid counterclaim, the trustees are entitled to charge interest on arrears, potentially increasing the owner's liability. The adjudicator also remarked more generally that the Sectional Titles Act imposes a positive obligation on trustees to recover levies from defaulting owners, and that penalty, administrative, or debt-collection fees are generally unlawful unless expressly authorised by the scheme's conduct or management rules. The official law-report citation was not provided in the judgment because this is a CSOS adjudication order rather than a reported court judgment.
This adjudication reinforces an important principle in South African community schemes and sectional titles law: levy obligations attach to ownership and cannot be unilaterally suspended by an owner asserting a disputed counterclaim against the body corporate. The decision is significant for confirming, within the CSOS adjudication framework, that set-off is unavailable where the alleged reciprocal debt is not liquid. It also clarifies that bodies corporate may recover interest on arrear levies if properly authorised by trustee resolution and the prescribed rules, but may not impose administration charges unless expressly authorised by law or the scheme rules.