CaseNotes LogoCaseNotes
  • Home
  • Library
  • Research
  • Discussion Hub
  • Wiki
  • Latin Dictionary
  • Question Bank
  • Settings
S

Student

Student Account

South African Law • Jurisdictional Corpus
HomeLibraryResearchQuestionsSettings
Judicial Precedent
Ask AI

Premier, Gauteng and Others v Democratic Alliance and Others; All Tshwane Councillors who are Members of the Economic Freedom Fighters and Another v Democratic Alliance and Others; African National Congress v Democratic Alliance and Others

Citation[2021] ZACC 34
JurisdictionZA

Facts of the Case

Data not available for this record

Legal Issues

Data not available for this record

Judicial Outcome

Data not available for this record

Ratio Decidendi

Data not available for this record

Obiter Dicta

Data not available for this record

Legal Significance

Data not available for this record

Free account

Get the most out of this judgment

Create a free CaseNotes account to save this case, see how it's cited, get an AI summary, and search 10,000+ SA judgments.

Create free accountor sign in

Case relationship graph

Case Network

Explore 15 related cases • Click to navigate

Current Case
Related Case

Cases Cited in This Judgment

  • African Transformation Movement v The Speaker of the National Assembly and Others(Case no 643/2021) [2021] ZASCA 164 (2 December 2021)
    Cites

    Cited for remarks on accountability of political parties to the electorate and the role of general elections as an extra-parliamentary mechanism for holding…

  • Albutt v Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation and Others(CCT 54/09) [2010] ZACC 4
    Cites

    Cited on rationality as a ground of legality review and the Executive's wide discretion in selecting means to achieve constitutionally permissible objectives.

  • Ashok Rama Mistry v The Interim National Medical and Dental Council of South Africa and OthersCCT 13/97; 1998 (7) BCLR 880 (CC); 1998 (4) SA 1127 (CC)
    Applies

    The principle of legality, namely that public power is only legitimate where lawful, is derived from this case.

  • Camilla Jane McDowell v The Minister of Justice and Constitutional DevelopmentCase no. A 104/2007 (unreported, Cape High Court, 21 May 2007)
    Applies

    The Court applied the Biowatch principle to protect the DA against liability for costs awarded to state parties.

  • City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality v Gauteng Development Tribunal(335/08) [2009] ZASCA 106 (22 September 2009)
    Cites

    Cited on the distinct, interdependent and interrelated nature of South Africa's three spheres of government and the circumscribed scope for intervention by one…

  • Donald Veldman v The Director of Public Prosecutions (Witwatersrand Local Division)CCT 19/05 (Decided 5 December 2005)
    Cites

    Cited for the interpretation of the word 'including' as indicating an addition or enlargement.

  • Electoral Commission of South Africa v Democratic Alliance and Others(1068/2019) [2021] ZASCA 103 (23 July 2021)
    Cites

    Cited in relation to rationality as a ground of legality review.

  • Fose v Minister of Safety and SecurityCCT 14/96; 1997 (3) SA 786 (CC); 1997 (7) BCLR 851 (CC)
    Cites

    Cited with regard to fashioning an appropriate remedy for the enforcement of rights.

  • In re: Certification of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 19961996 (4) SA 744 (CC); 1996 (10) BCLR 1253 (CC); Case CCT 23/96
    Cites

    Cited for sections 154(1) and 41(1)(h) of the Constitution, which subject the right to intervene to the obligation to cooperate and support municipalities.

  • Jacob Gedleyihlekisa Zuma v Democratic Alliance and Economic Freedom Fighters(1028/2019) [2021] ZASCA 39 (13 April 2021)
    Cites

    Cited for the meaning of 'appropriate' as connoting providing a proper, fitting, suitable and effective remedy.

  • Lilian Dudley v The City of Cape Town and Ivan TomsCCT 5/04
    Cites

    Cited for the principle that courts must show deference to political choices made by the right political role-players and should not attribute superior wisdom…

  • Luke M Tembani and Others v President of the Republic of South Africa and Another(167/2021) [2022] ZASCA 70 (20 May 2022)
    Cites

    Cited as an example of abuse of power and rationality as grounds of legality review.

  • Member of the Executive Council for Development Planning and Local Government in the Provincial Government of Gauteng v The Democratic Party and Others1998 (4) SA 1157 (CC); 1998 (7) BCLR 855 (CC); Case CCT 33/97
    Applies

    The Court applied the factors for determining whether to grant leave to appeal directly, as set out in this case.

  • Merafong Demarcation Forum and Others v President of the Republic of South Africa and Others[2008] ZACC 10
    Cites

    Cited for the proposition that voters must deal with bad politics, while courts deal with bad law, and that courts should not interfere in the lawful exercise…

  • Msobomvu Qhinga and Others v The State(CCT 50/10) [2011] ZACC 18
    Cites

    Cited to show the Court's approach of remitting matters rather than determining issues not decided by the court below.

  • Ngaka Modiri Molema District Municipality v Chairperson, North West Provincial Executive Committee and Others[2014] ZACC 31
    Cites

    Cited on the potential prejudice and urgency being suffered by the people and communities due to disruption of basic essential services.

  • Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association of SA: In re Ex parte President of RSA2000 (2) SA 674 (CC)
    Cites

    Cited on the principle of legality and rationality as a ground of review.

  • President of the Republic of South Africa and Others v M & G Media Limited(CCT 03/11) [2011] ZACC 32
    Cites

    Cited to show this Court's approach to remitting matters to the High Court where issues have not been determined below.

  • President of the Republic of South Africa and Others v South African Dental Association and Another[2015] ZACC 2
    Cites

    Cited as an example of a case on abuse of power.

  • SA Bank of Athens Limited v May van ZylCase No 431/03 (SCA, unreported judgment delivered 21 February 2005)
    Cites

    Cited as an example of a legality challenge based on lack of authority.

  • The Premier for the Province of Gauteng and Others v Democratic Alliance and Others(394/2020) [2020] ZASCA 136 (27 October 2020)
    Appeal From

    This is the judgment under appeal; the appeal was upheld in part and the order set aside and substituted.

  • The Premier of the Western Cape v Overberg District Municipality(801/2010) [2011] ZASCA 23 (18 March 2011)
    Cites

    Cited to show that the Supreme Court of Appeal has already weighed in on the interpretation and application of section 139.

  • The Union of Refugee Women and Others v The Director: The Private Security Industry Regulatory Authority and OthersCase CCT 39/06, decided on 12 December 2006
    Cites

    Cited on the purpose of direct appeal provisions to ensure speedy resolution and reduce costs.

  • Wilmot Mandla Chagi and 29 Others v Special Investigating Unit[2008] ZACC 22
    Cites

    Cited to show the Court's approach to remitting matters where issues have not been determined below.

Cited By 2 Cases

  • Afriforum NPC v The Premier, Gauteng Province and Others(1000/2020) [2021] ZASCA 185 (24 December 2021)
    Related To

    The Constitutional Court found the dissolution of the council unlawful and issued an order compelling the MEC to invoke his powers in terms of item 14(4) of…

  • South African Local Government Bargaining Council and Others v Municipal Workers Retirement Fund and Others(770/2023) [2025] ZASCA 120 (21 August 2025)
    Cites

    Cited to support that legality review is the default method of judicial control of all public power.

Practice This Case

Sign up to practise IRAC analysis, issue spotting, and argument building on this case.

Explore More Cases

More South Africa cases

  • 3M South Africa (Pty) Ltd v The Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service(272/09) [2010] ZASCA 20 (23 March 2010)
  • 4 Seasons Logistics CC v Kgotse(1215/2023) [2026] ZASCA 09 (04 February 2026)
  • 4 Seasons Logistics CC v Nicholas Ngwanammoto Kgotse(1215/2023) [2026] ZASCA 09 (4 February 2026)
  • 4-Tune Investments (Pty) Ltd v Kingsgate Body CorporateCSOS 4565/WC/22 (Adjudication Order, 29 November 2023)
  • 68 Wolmarans Street Johannesburg (Pty) Ltd and Others v Tufh Limited(1263/2022) [2024] ZASCA 48 (15 April 2024)
  • 9 on Rydal Vale Court Body Corporate v Pan African Holdings Pty LtdCSOS-4563/KZN/23 (Adjudication Order, 8 November 2023)
  • AAA Investments (Proprietary) Limited v The Micro Finance Regulatory Council and Another2006 (11) BCLR 1255 (CC) (also reported as CCT 51/05)
  • A A Alloy Foundry (Pty) Limited v Titaco Projects (Pty) LimitedCase No. 309/97