CaseNotes LogoCaseNotes
  • Home
  • Library
  • Research
  • Discussion Hub
  • Wiki
  • Latin Dictionary
  • Question Bank
  • Settings
S

Student

Student Account

South African Law • Jurisdictional Corpus
HomeLibraryResearchQuestionsSettings
Judicial Precedent
Ask AI

Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association of SA: In re Ex parte President of RSA

Citation2000 (2) SA 674 (CC)
JurisdictionZA
Area of Law
Constitutional LawAdministrative Law
Free account

Get the most out of this judgment

Create a free CaseNotes account to save this case, see how it's cited, get an AI summary, and search 10,000+ SA judgments.

Create free accountor sign in

Facts of the Case

The President promulgated regulations under the Medicines Act without following proper procedures. The Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association challenged the regulations, arguing they were unconstitutional and invalid because they exceeded the President's powers and were enacted without proper consultation.

Legal Issues

  • Legality
  • Rule of law
  • Executive power
  • Constitutional supremacy
  • Rationality review

Judicial Outcome

The regulations were declared invalid. The court ordered that new regulations could only be promulgated after proper consultation and within the limits of the enabling legislation.

Ratio Decidendi

The principle of legality requires that all exercise of public power must be authorized by law and must be rational. This principle flows from the rule of law, which is a foundational value of the Constitution. Executive action that is not authorized by law or that is irrational is inconsistent with the Constitution and therefore invalid. The principle of legality applies even where specific constitutional rights are not directly implicated.

Obiter Dicta

Data not available for this record

Legal Significance

This landmark case established the principle of legality as a ground of constitutional review separate from the Bill of Rights. It confirmed that all exercises of public power - including by the President - must be authorized by law and must be rational. The case is foundational to administrative law and constitutional litigation in South Africa.

Cited By 123 Cases

  • AAA Investments (Proprietary) Limited v The Micro Finance Regulatory Council and Another2006 (11) BCLR 1255 (CC) (also reported as CCT 51/05)
    Cites

    Authority that exercise of all public power must comply with doctrine of legality and rule of law.

  • Abahlali baseMjondolo Movement SA and Another v Premier of the Province of KwaZulu-Natal and Others(CCT 12/09) [2009] ZACC 31
    Cites

    Cited for the principle that it is a requirement of the rule of law that the exercise of public power must not be arbitrary and decisions must be rationally…

  • Abduraghman Thebus and Moegamat Adams v The StateCCT 36/02
    Cites

    Cited for the proposition that the common law supplements the Constitution and must be developed to fulfil its purposes.

  • A Bullock NO & 2 Others v Provincial Government of North West ProvinceCase number: 44/03 (Supreme Court of Appeal)
    Cites

    Cited for the principle that administrative law regulates the exercise of public power and that courts control public power under the Constitution, and that…

  • Action SA v The Electoral Commission of South Africa(006/2021/) [2022] ZAEC 2 (18 January 2022)
    Applies

    Court applies the test for rationality review, requiring that the exercise of public power be rationally related to the purpose for which the power was given.

  • Albutt v Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation and Others(CCT 54/09) [2010] ZACC 4
    Cites

    Cited for the proposition that the exercise of all public power must comply with the Constitution and the doctrine of legality.

  • AmaBhungane Centre for Investigative Journalism NPC and Another v Minister of Justice and Correctional Services and Others; Minister of Police v AmaBhungane Centre for Investigative Journalism NPC and Others[2021] ZACC 3
    Cites

    Cited for the principle that the principle of legality is a subset of the rule law, and that the exercise of all public power must comply with the Constitution…

  • Association of Mineworkers and Construction Union and Others v Chamber of Mines of South Africa and Others[2017] ZACC 3
    Cites

    Cited for the proposition that the rule of law requires the exercise of public power by the Executive to be rationally related to the purpose for which the…

  • Association of Regional Magistrates of Southern Africa v President of the Republic of South Africa(CCT 91/12) [2013] ZACC 13
    Applies

    Applied for the interpretation of 'any conduct' of the President in section 172(2)(a) to be given a wide meaning, ensuring Constitutional Court control over…

  • Bapedi Marota Mamone v The Commission of Traditional Leadership Disputes and Claims & others(260/13) [2014] ZASCA 30 (28 March 2014)
    Cites

    Cited at paragraphs 86 and 90 for the principle that rationality is an objective test and that courts cannot substitute their opinions for the decision-maker…

  • Barkhuizen v Napier(CCT 72/05) [2007] ZACC 5
    Cites

    Cited for the principle that all law derives its force from the Constitution and courts have a constitutional obligation to develop common law so as to bring…

  • Bato Star Fishing (Pty) Ltd v The Minister of Environmental Affairs and Tourism and OthersCCT 27/03
    Applies

    The Court applies Pharmaceutical Manufacturers to hold that the grundnorm of administrative law is now the Constitution, not the common law ultra vires…

  • Beadica 231 CC and Others v Trustees for the time being of the Oregon Trust and Others[2020] ZACC 13
    Cites

    This Court held that there is only one system of law shaped by the Constitution, which is the supreme law, and all law derives its force from the Constitution.

  • Bengwenyama Minerals (Pty) Ltd and Others v Genorah Resources (Pty) Ltd and Others(CCT 39/10) [2010] ZACC 26
    Cites

    Cited for the historical context of administrative law, noting the need to claim space and push boundaries to find means of controlling public power.

  • Beweging vir Christelik-Volkseie Onderwys v Minister of Education(308/2011) [2012] ZASCA 45 (29 March 2012)
    Cites

    Court cites this case for the proposition that review jurisdiction of courts is no longer a common law jurisdiction.

  • Billy Lesedi Masetlha v The President of the Republic of South Africa and Manala Elias Manzini(CCT 01/07) [2007] ZACC 20
    Applies

    Applied the rationality test and principle of legality as a constitutional control on the exercise of public power.

  • Body Corporate of Greenacres v Greenacres Unit 17 CC(521/06) [2007] ZASCA 152
    Cites

    Cited for the doctrine of legality under the Constitution, namely that a regulation which is inconsistent with the statute under which it was made is invalid.

  • Brian Basil Nel N.O. and Another v The Master of the High Court Eastern Cape and OthersCase No: A9/03 [2004] SCA (reported)
    Cites

    Cited for the proposition that principles of constitutional review now derive authority from the written Constitution rather than common law.

  • Buffalo City Metropolitan Municipality v Asla Construction (Pty) Limited[2019] ZACC 15
    Cites

    Cited for the principle that legality review is grounded in sections 1(c), 41(1)(b), 195 and 217 of the Constitution.

  • Buffalo City Municipality v Willy GaussCase No: 5/04 (SCA)
    Cites

    Cited for the proposition that the Constitution shifted constitutionalism and public law from the realm of common law to the prescripts of a written…

  • City of Cape Town v Aurecon South Africa (Pty) Ltd[2017] ZACC 5
    Related To

    Referenced for the interplay between review under PAJA and legality review.

  • City of Cape Town v South African National Roads Authority Limited & others(20786/2014) [2015] ZASCA 58 (30 March 2015)
    Cites

    Cited to show that s 39(2) ensures the common law evolves within the framework of the Constitution consistently with basic norms.

  • City of Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality v Cable City (Pty) Ltd(232/08) [2009] ZASCA 87 (10 September 2009)
    Cites

    Cited for the principle that a determination of whether public power has been exercised lawfully must comply with the doctrine of legality.

  • City of Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality v RPM Bricks Proprietary Limited(177/2006) [2007] ZASCA 28
    Cites

    Cited to support that common law must evolve within the framework of the Constitution consistently with basic norms of the legal order.

  • Colleen Mzingisi Dumani v Desmond Nair & another(144/2012) [2012] ZASCA 196 (30 November 2012)
    Cites

    Cited as authority for the doctrine of legality which requires that power conferred on a functionary to make decisions in the public interest should be…

  • Competition Commission of South Africa v Senwes Limited(CCT 61/11) [2012] ZACC 6
    Cites

    Cited for the principle of legality as one of the most important principles in control of public power in the constitutional order.

  • Competition Commission v Loungefoam (Pty) Ltd and Others(CCT 90/11) [2012] ZACC 15
    Follows

    Pharmaceutical Manufacturers is followed for the principle that issues concerning the powers of an organ of state are constitutional matters.

  • Crawford Lindsay Von Abo v President of the Republic of South Africa(CCT 67/08) [2009] ZACC 15
    Applies

    Applied for the principle that 'any conduct of the President' in section 172(2)(a) must be accorded a generous and wide meaning to ensure supervision by the…

  • David Dikoko v Thupi Zacharia MokhatlaCase CCT 62/05 (decided 3 August 2006)
    Cites

    Cited for the principle that there is only one system of law shaped by the Constitution as supreme law.

  • Dawood and Another v Minister of Home Affairs and Others; Shalabi and Another v Minister of Home Affairs and Others; Thomas and Another v Minister of Home Affairs and Others2000 (3) SA 936 (CC); 2000 (8) BCLR 837 (CC)
    Cites

    The court cites this case for the principle that the rule of law is a foundational value of the Constitution and requires that rules be stated in a clear and…

  • Democratic Alliance v President of the Republic of South Africa and Others(CCT 122/11) [2012] ZACC 24
    Applies

    Applied for the rationality test requiring that power must be rationally related to the purpose for which it was conferred.

  • Democratic Alliance v The Acting National Director of Public Prosecutions(288/11) [2012] ZASCA 15 (20 March 2012)
    Follows

    Applied for extensive treatment of constitutional control over the exercise of public power and the doctrine of legality, including the requirement of…

  • Doctor Sudhir Mohun and Another v Advocate Brett Kingsley Phillips N O obo Shearer and Another(1219/2021) [2022] ZASCA 186
    Cites

    Cited for the principle that development of the common law must occur within the framework of the Constitution and consistently with the basic norms of the…

  • Donald Veldman v The Director of Public Prosecutions (Witwatersrand Local Division)CCT 19/05 (Decided 5 December 2005)
    Cites

    Cited for observations on the rule of law and its substantive and procedural content, the supremacy of Parliament, and fundamental rights under common law.

  • Dr AB Xuma Local Municipality v Lonwabo Delihlazo and OthersCase No: 3883/2024 (ECHC)
    Cites

    Cited in the context of lawfulness depending on the terms of the empowering statute and the exercise of public power being unlawful and invalid if not…

  • Eagles Landing Body Corporate v Molewa NO and Others2003 (1) SA 412 (T)
    Applies

    Applied for the doctrine of legality, an incident of the rule of law, applicable to the exercise of a public power; also for the principle that what would have…

  • Electoral Commission of South Africa v Democratic Alliance and Others(1068/2019) [2021] ZASCA 103 (23 July 2021)
    Applies

    The court applies this precedent's principle that the exercise of public power must not be arbitrary or irrational as part of the principle of legality.

  • Electronic Media Network Limited and Others v e.tv (Pty) Limited and Others[2017] ZACC 17
    Applies

    The Court applies the principle that all exercises of public power must be capable of being analysed and justified rationally under the principle of legality.

  • Ellah Tayengwa and Others v Zimbabwe Electoral Commission and OthersHH 421-22, Case No HC 5854/20
    Cites

    Cited for the principle of legality demanding a respect for the Constitution and statute.

  • Fedlife Assurance Limited v Hendrik Johannes WolfaardtCase No: 450/99
    Applies

    Applied for the principle that the Constitution always determines the nature and ambit of law in South Africa, as there is only one system of law.

  • Frank Mhlongo and Others v Tryphina Mokoena N O and Others(723/20) [2022] ZASCA 78
    Cites

    Cited for the principle that acting beyond granted powers is invalid.

  • Gauteng Gambling Board & another v MEC for Economic Development, Gauteng Provincial Government(620/2012) [2013] ZASCA 67 (27 May 2013)
    Cites

    Cited for the principle of legality constraining exercise of power.

  • Gees v The Provincial Minister of Cultural Affairs and Sport, Western Cape(974/2015) [2015] ZASCA 136 (29 September 2016)
    Cites

    Cited for the principle of legality, reaffirming that public power must be lawfully conferred.

  • Glenister v President of the Republic of South Africa and Others(CCT 48/10) [2011] ZACC 6
    Applies

    Applied for the rationality test for legislation.

  • Grace Masuku and Others v Minister of Mineral Resources and OthersCase No: 25764/2019, [2022] ZAGPPHC (10 March 2022)
    Applies

    Court applies the principle that a finding of irrationality is likely to be made rarely and courts cannot strike down decisions merely because they disagree or…

  • Greys Marine Hout Bay (Pty) Ltd and Others v Minister of Public Works and OthersCase No: 347/04 (SCA)
    Cites

    Cited for the principle of legality constraining the exercise of public power.

  • Hangklip/Kleinmond Federation of Ratepayers Associations v The Minister for Environmental Planning and Economic Development: Western Cape and OthersCase No: 4009/2008 (Western Cape High Court, Cape Town) - Judgment delivered 1 October 2009
    Applies

    Applied for the principle that objective rationality is a minimum threshold requirement for exercise of public power, and courts may not substitute their…

  • Head of Department, Department of Education, Free State Province v Welkom High School and Others[2013] ZACC 25
    Cites

    Cited for the proposition that in order to give effect to the rule of law, an organ of state should have recourse to the courts or Parliament and cannot…

  • Head of Department: Mpumalanga Department of Education and Another v Hoërskool Ermelo and Another(CCT 40/09) [2009] ZACC 32
    Cites

    Cited for the principle that the exercise of public power is subject to the legality requirement of the Constitution.

  • International Trade Administration Commission v SCAW South Africa (Pty) Ltd (with Bridon International Limited intervening)(CCT 59/09) [2010] ZACC 6
    Cites

    Cited for the principle that in our constitutional democracy, all public power is subject to constitutional control.

  • Jacobus Bogaards v The State(CCT 120/11) [2012] ZACC 23
    Applies

    Applied to explain that there is only one system of law, over which the Constitution is supreme, and the common law must be developed consistently with the…

  • Jano Nortjé and Another v The Minister of Correctional Services and OthersSaak no: 213/99 (SCA)
    Cites

    Cited for the proposition that common law principles remain authoritative in determining what is procedurally fair under the Constitution, specifically at…

  • JDJ Properties CC and Another v Umngeni Local Municipality and Another(873/11) [2012] ZASCA 186 (29 November 2012)
    Cites

    Cited for the principle of review on grounds of legality and rationality.

  • Jonathan Zealand v Minister for Justice and Constitutional Development and Minister of Correctional Services(CCT 54/07) [2008] ZACC 3
    Applies

    Applied to support that the constitutional principle of legality requires that decisions must be rationally related to the purpose for which the power was…

  • Judicial Service Commission v Cape Bar Council (Centre for Constitutional Rights as amicus curiae)(818/2011) [2012] ZASCA 115 (14 September 2012)
    Applies

    Applied for the principle that legality requires the exercise of public power not to be arbitrary or irrational.

  • Kasselman NO and Others v The South African National Road Agency SOC Ltd (SANRAL) and Others(297/2024) [2026] ZASCA 02 (12 January 2026)
    Applies

    Applied the principle that the exercise of all public power is subject to the principle of legality, which requires that power be exercised rationally and…

  • KwaZulu-Natal Joint Liaison Committee v Member of the Executive Council, Department of Education, KwaZulu-Natal and Others[2013] ZACC 10
    Cites

    Cited by Froneman J for the rule of law or legality principle that the state cannot act outside its constitutional or legislative powers.

  • Law Society of South Africa and Others v Minister for Transport and Another(CCT 38/10) [2010] ZACC 25
    Cites

    Cited for the principles that the state may not act capriciously or arbitrarily and that the rationality test is objective, requiring rational connection…

  • Lester v Ndlambe Municipality[2013] ZASCA 95 (22 August 2013); Case No: 514/12
    Cites

    Cited for the oft-quoted dictum of Chaskalson CJ that all public power must comply with the Constitution and the doctrine of legality.

  • Madelein Brisley v Antoinette DrotskySaak no: 432/2000
    Cites

    Cited for the constitutional principle that all law derives force from the Constitution.

Practice This Case

Sign up to practise IRAC analysis, issue spotting, and argument building on this case.

Explore More Cases

More Constitutional Law cases

  • (1) Petros Makaza (2) Golden Nhika v The State and (1) Khumbuzo Gumbo (2) Sydney Ndachengedzwa v The StateCCZ 16/17 (Const. Application No. CCZ 5/13 and Const. Application No. CCZ 102/13)
  • (1) Tungamirai Madzokere (2) Lazarus Maengahama (3) Stanford Maengahama (4) Phineous Nhatarikwa (5) Stanford Mangwiro (6) Yvonne Musarurwa (7) Rebecca Mafukeni v The StateSC 8/12; Civil Application No. 318/11
  • 68 Wolmarans Street Johannesburg (Pty) Ltd and Others v Tufh Limited(1263/2022) [2024] ZASCA 48 (15 April 2024)
  • AAA Investments (Proprietary) Limited v The Micro Finance Regulatory Council and Another2006 (11) BCLR 1255 (CC) (also reported as CCT 51/05)
  • Aaron Musiteyi v The StateHMT 2-21, B 09/21
  • Abahlali baseMjondolo Movement SA and Another v Premier of the Province of KwaZulu-Natal and Others(CCT 12/09) [2009] ZACC 31
  • AB and Another v Minister of Social Development[2016] ZACC 43
  • AB and Another v Pridwin Preparatory School and Others[2020] ZACC 12

More South Africa cases

  • 3M South Africa (Pty) Ltd v The Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service(272/09) [2010] ZASCA 20 (23 March 2010)
  • 4 Seasons Logistics CC v Kgotse(1215/2023) [2026] ZASCA 09 (04 February 2026)
  • 4 Seasons Logistics CC v Nicholas Ngwanammoto Kgotse(1215/2023) [2026] ZASCA 09 (4 February 2026)
  • 4-Tune Investments (Pty) Ltd v Kingsgate Body CorporateCSOS 4565/WC/22 (Adjudication Order, 29 November 2023)
  • 68 Wolmarans Street Johannesburg (Pty) Ltd and Others v Tufh Limited(1263/2022) [2024] ZASCA 48 (15 April 2024)
  • 9 on Rydal Vale Court Body Corporate v Pan African Holdings Pty LtdCSOS-4563/KZN/23 (Adjudication Order, 8 November 2023)
  • AAA Investments (Proprietary) Limited v The Micro Finance Regulatory Council and Another
2006 (11) BCLR 1255 (CC) (also reported as CCT 51/05)
  • A A Alloy Foundry (Pty) Limited v Titaco Projects (Pty) LimitedCase No. 309/97