CaseNotes LogoCaseNotes
  • Home
  • Library
  • Research
  • Discussion Hub
  • Wiki
  • Latin Dictionary
  • Question Bank
  • Settings
S

Student

Student Account

South African Law • Jurisdictional Corpus
HomeLibraryResearchQuestionsSettings
Judicial Precedent
Ask AI

National Land Transport Amendment Act, 2023

CitationAct No. 23 of 2023; Government Gazette No. 50800, 11 June 2024
JurisdictionZA
Area of Law
Administrative LawTransport Law
Free account

Get the most out of this judgment

Create a free CaseNotes account to save this case, see how it's cited, get an AI summary, and search 10,000+ SA judgments.

Create free accountor sign in
Local Government Law
Statutory Interpretation
Public Regulatory Law

Facts of the Case

The text provided is not a court judgment but a Government Gazette publishing national legislation after presidential assent. It records that the President assented on 6 June 2024 to Act No. 23 of 2023, the National Land Transport Amendment Act, 2023, which amends the National Land Transport Act 5 of 2009. The Act inserts and amends definitions, regulates e-hailing services, promotes accessible and non-motorised transport, updates the powers and composition of national, provincial and municipal regulatory entities, revises contracting arrangements for subsidised, commercial, negotiated and stopgap public transport contracts, amends operating licence procedures, and creates transitional and exemption mechanisms.

Legal Issues

  • No judicial legal issues arise because the text is legislation, not adjudication.
  • The legislative measures address regulation of e-hailing services, accessible and non-motorised transport, contracting powers of provinces and municipalities, operating licence administration, and appeals within the transport regulatory framework.

Judicial Outcome

Parliament enacted the National Land Transport Amendment Act, 2023, and it was published after presidential assent. The Act comes into operation on a date or dates to be determined by the President by proclamation in the Gazette.

Ratio Decidendi

Not available. There is no ratio decidendi because this is not a judicial decision. The binding force arises from legislation enacted by Parliament, not from a court's legal principle.

Obiter Dicta

Not available. There are no obiter dicta because the text is not a judgment and contains no judicial commentary.

Legal Significance

The Act is significant because it modernises South Africa's land transport regulatory framework. It expressly regulates electronic hailing services, strengthens provision for accessible and non-motorised transport, restructures responsibilities among national, provincial and municipal transport regulators, broadens contracting mechanisms including stopgap contracts, and updates licensing, enforcement, appeal and transitional provisions. It is important for public transport governance, municipal transport planning, and the formal legal recognition of e-hailing within the national transport system.

Explore More Cases

More Administrative Law cases

  • 1. Tapera Sengweni v The Law Society of Zimbabwe 2. Augustine Runesu Chizikani v The Law Society of ZimbabweHH 706-19, LPDT 8/18 and LPDT 27/18
  • 3M South Africa (Pty) Ltd v The Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service(272/09) [2010] ZASCA 20 (23 March 2010)
  • AAA Investments (Proprietary) Limited v The Micro Finance Regulatory Council and Another2006 (11) BCLR 1255 (CC) (also reported as CCT 51/05)
  • Aaron Shanje v Ticharwa Murehwa and OthersHH 218-18, HC 9346/17
  • Aaron Zhomwe v BHP Minerals CompanyS.C. 3/2001 (Civil Appeal No. 25/2000)
  • Abahlali baseMjondolo Movement SA and Another v Premier of the Province of KwaZulu-Natal and Others

Practice This Case

Sign up to practise IRAC analysis, issue spotting, and argument building on this case.

(CCT 12/09) [2009] ZACC 31
  • Abbott v Overstrand Municipality(99/2015) [2016] ZASCA 68
  • Abdul Kadir Yassin Ismail v Registrar General N.O and Minister of Home AffairsHH 519-17, HC 9899/16
  • More South Africa cases

    • 3M South Africa (Pty) Ltd v The Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service(272/09) [2010] ZASCA 20 (23 March 2010)
    • 4 Seasons Logistics CC v Kgotse(1215/2023) [2026] ZASCA 09 (04 February 2026)
    • 4 Seasons Logistics CC v Nicholas Ngwanammoto Kgotse(1215/2023) [2026] ZASCA 09 (4 February 2026)
    • 4-Tune Investments (Pty) Ltd v Kingsgate Body CorporateCSOS 4565/WC/22 (Adjudication Order, 29 November 2023)
    • 68 Wolmarans Street Johannesburg (Pty) Ltd and Others v Tufh Limited(1263/2022) [2024] ZASCA 48 (15 April 2024)
    • 9 on Rydal Vale Court Body Corporate v Pan African Holdings Pty LtdCSOS-4563/KZN/23 (Adjudication Order, 8 November 2023)
    • AAA Investments (Proprietary) Limited v The Micro Finance Regulatory Council and Another2006 (11) BCLR 1255 (CC) (also reported as CCT 51/05)
    • A A Alloy Foundry (Pty) Limited v Titaco Projects (Pty) LimitedCase No. 309/97