CaseNotes LogoCaseNotes
  • Home
  • Library
  • Research
  • Discussion Hub
  • Wiki
  • Latin Dictionary
  • Question Bank
  • Settings
S

Student

Student Account

South African Law • Jurisdictional Corpus
HomeLibraryResearchQuestionsSettings
Judicial Precedent
Ask AI

Minister of Local Government, Environmental Affairs and Development Planning, Western Cape v Habitat Council and others

JurisdictionZA

Facts of the Case

Data not available for this record

Legal Issues

Data not available for this record

Judicial Outcome

Data not available for this record

Ratio Decidendi

Data not available for this record

Obiter Dicta

Data not available for this record

Legal Significance

Data not available for this record

Free account

Get the most out of this judgment

Create a free CaseNotes account to save this case, see how it's cited, get an AI summary, and search 10,000+ SA judgments.

Create free accountor sign in

Cases Cited in This Judgment

  • Albutt v Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation and Others(CCT 54/09) [2010] ZACC 4
    Cites

    Cited for the principle of judicial economy that the Court should do no more than necessary to decide the question before it.

  • CDA Boerdery (Edms) Bpk and Another v The Nelson Mandela Metropolitan Municipality and Others(526/05) [2007] ZASCA 1
    Cites

    Cited in support of the principle that municipalities possess original constitutional powers.

  • City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality v Gauteng Development Tribunal and Others(CCT 89/09) [2010] ZACC 11
    Applies

    Court applies this case's definition of 'municipal planning' which includes zoning of land and establishment of townships, and affirms that all municipal…

  • Fedsure Life Assurance Ltd and Others v Greater Johannesburg Transitional Metropolitan Council and OthersCCT 7/98 [Decided on 14 October 1998]
    Cites

    Cited in support of the principle that municipalities enjoy constitutionally entrenched powers.

  • In re: Certification of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 19961996 (4) SA 744 (CC); 1996 (10) BCLR 1253 (CC); Case CCT 23/96
    Applies

    Court applies this case's interpretation that provincial monitoring and supervisory powers under section 155 are 'hands-off' and do not represent a substantial…

  • Maccsand (Pty) Ltd v City of Cape Town(CCT 103/11) [2012] ZACC 7
    Cites

    Cited to illustrate the interplay between LUPO approvals granted by municipalities and statutory approvals granted by other spheres of government.

  • Premier: Limpopo Province v Speaker: Limpopo Provincial Legislature and Others(CCT 94/10) [2011] ZACC 25
    Cites

    Cited as an example of mechanisms by which constitutional validity of provincial Bills or Acts can be referred to the Constitutional Court.

  • Pretorius v Trustees of Ponders End Body Corporate and Earth Zone PropertiesCSOS 7586/GP/22 (Adjudication Order, 03 June 2024)
    Appeal From

    The Constitutional Court confirmed paragraph 1 of the High Court's order declaring section 44 of LUPO unconstitutional and invalid. However, it refused to…

  • The City of Cape Town and Minister of Provincial and Local Government v Anita Marie Robertson and Guy Trevor Robertson(CCT 19/04) [2004] ZACC 21
    Follows

    Court applies the principle that the Constitution has moved away from a hierarchical division of governmental power and established municipalities as…

Practice This Case

Sign up to practise IRAC analysis, issue spotting, and argument building on this case.

Explore More Cases

More South Africa cases

  • 3M South Africa (Pty) Ltd v The Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service(272/09) [2010] ZASCA 20 (23 March 2010)
  • 4 Seasons Logistics CC v Kgotse(1215/2023) [2026] ZASCA 09 (04 February 2026)
  • 4 Seasons Logistics CC v Nicholas Ngwanammoto Kgotse(1215/2023) [2026] ZASCA 09 (4 February 2026)
  • 4-Tune Investments (Pty) Ltd v Kingsgate Body CorporateCSOS 4565/WC/22 (Adjudication Order, 29 November 2023)
  • 68 Wolmarans Street Johannesburg (Pty) Ltd and Others v Tufh Limited(1263/2022) [2024] ZASCA 48 (15 April 2024)
  • 9 on Rydal Vale Court Body Corporate v Pan African Holdings Pty LtdCSOS-4563/KZN/23 (Adjudication Order, 8 November 2023)
  • AAA Investments (Proprietary) Limited v The Micro Finance Regulatory Council and Another2006 (11) BCLR 1255 (CC) (also reported as CCT 51/05)
  • A A Alloy Foundry (Pty) Limited v Titaco Projects (Pty) LimitedCase No. 309/97