CaseNotes LogoCaseNotes
  • Home
  • Library
  • Research
  • Discussion Hub
  • Wiki
  • Latin Dictionary
  • Question Bank
  • Settings
S

Student

Student Account

South African Law • Jurisdictional Corpus
HomeLibraryResearchQuestionsSettings
Judicial Precedent
Ask AI

Member of the Executive Council for Local Government, Environmental Affairs and Development Planning, Western Cape and another v Plotz and another

JurisdictionZA

Facts of the Case

Data not available for this record

Legal Issues

Data not available for this record

Judicial Outcome

Data not available for this record

Ratio Decidendi

Data not available for this record

Obiter Dicta

Data not available for this record

Legal Significance

Data not available for this record

Free account

Get the most out of this judgment

Create a free CaseNotes account to save this case, see how it's cited, get an AI summary, and search 10,000+ SA judgments.

Create free accountor sign in

Cases Cited in This Judgment

  • Camilla Jane McDowell v The Minister of Justice and Constitutional DevelopmentCase no. A 104/2007 (unreported, Cape High Court, 21 May 2007)
    Cites

    Court cites the rule that unsuccessful litigants who have sought, in good faith, to vindicate constitutional rights, should not have costs awarded against…

  • Cool Ideas 1186 CC v Hubbard and Another[2014] ZACC 16
    Follows

    Court follows the principle that s 7(2)(c) of PAJA postulates an application to the court by the aggrieved party for exemption from the obligation to exhaust…

  • Hotz and Others v University of Cape Town[2017] ZACC 10
    Cites

    Court cites the case for the proposition that a review under PAJA constitutes a constitutional issue.

  • Pretorius v Trustees of Ponders End Body Corporate and Earth Zone PropertiesCSOS 7586/GP/22 (Adjudication Order, 03 June 2024)
    Appeal From

    The Supreme Court of Appeal (Meyer AJA, with Shongwe AP, Swain and Mathopo JJA and Mokgohloa AJA concurring) allowed the appeal with costs on 1 December 2017.…

  • SA Bank of Athens Limited v May van ZylCase No 431/03 (SCA, unreported judgment delivered 21 February 2005)
    Cites

    Court cites the well-established rule that unsuccessful litigants who have sought, in good faith, to vindicate constitutional rights, should not have costs…

Practice This Case

Sign up to practise IRAC analysis, issue spotting, and argument building on this case.

Explore More Cases

More South Africa cases

  • 3M South Africa (Pty) Ltd v The Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service(272/09) [2010] ZASCA 20 (23 March 2010)
  • 4 Seasons Logistics CC v Kgotse(1215/2023) [2026] ZASCA 09 (04 February 2026)
  • 4 Seasons Logistics CC v Nicholas Ngwanammoto Kgotse(1215/2023) [2026] ZASCA 09 (4 February 2026)
  • 4-Tune Investments (Pty) Ltd v Kingsgate Body CorporateCSOS 4565/WC/22 (Adjudication Order, 29 November 2023)
  • 68 Wolmarans Street Johannesburg (Pty) Ltd and Others v Tufh Limited(1263/2022) [2024] ZASCA 48 (15 April 2024)
  • 9 on Rydal Vale Court Body Corporate v Pan African Holdings Pty LtdCSOS-4563/KZN/23 (Adjudication Order, 8 November 2023)
  • AAA Investments (Proprietary) Limited v The Micro Finance Regulatory Council and Another2006 (11) BCLR 1255 (CC) (also reported as CCT 51/05)
  • A A Alloy Foundry (Pty) Limited v Titaco Projects (Pty) LimitedCase No. 309/97