CaseNotes LogoCaseNotes
  • Home
  • Library
  • Research
  • Discussion Hub
  • Wiki
  • Latin Dictionary
  • Question Bank
  • Settings
S

Student

Student Account

South African Law • Jurisdictional Corpus
HomeLibraryResearchQuestionsSettings
Judicial Precedent
Ask AI

Louwsrivier Plase (Pty) Ltd and Another v Eric Van Der Vendt and Others

CitationLCC105/2011 (unreported, delivered 23 June 2020)
JurisdictionZA
Area of Law
Land ClaimsLand Reform
Free account

Get the most out of this judgment

Create a free CaseNotes account to save this case, see how it's cited, get an AI summary, and search 10,000+ SA judgments.

Create free accountor sign in

Facts of the Case

The judgment text provided is incomplete and only contains the title page/cover sheet of the judgment. It shows proceedings in the Land Claims Court held at Randburg, case number LCC105/2011, delivered on 23 June 2020. The parties are Louwsrivier Plase (Pty) Ltd and J D Kirsten (Pty) Ltd as applicants against Eric Van Der Vendt, Edwina Van Der Vendt, and Drakenstein Municipality as respondents. The substantive facts of the case are not available in the provided text.

Legal Issues

  • Cannot be determined - the substantive judgment text was not provided, only the title page

Judicial Outcome

The final order cannot be determined from the provided text as only the title page was included.

Ratio Decidendi

Cannot be determined - the binding legal principles can only be extracted from the substantive judgment which was not provided in the text.

Obiter Dicta

Cannot be determined - any non-binding observations would be contained in the substantive judgment which was not provided in the text.

Legal Significance

Cannot be determined from the provided text. The case was heard in the Land Claims Court, which suggests it relates to land reform or restitution issues, but without the substantive judgment, its significance in South African jurisprudence cannot be assessed.

Practice This Case

Sign up to practise IRAC analysis, issue spotting, and argument building on this case.

Explore More Cases

More Land Claims cases

  • Bakgatla-Ba-Kgafela Communal Property Association v Kgoshi Kgolo Kgafela Kgafela and OthersLCC219/2012 (unreported)
  • Crookes Brothers Limited v Regional Land Claims Commission for the Province of Mpumalanga and others(590/2011) [2012] ZASCA 128 (21 September 2012)
  • Kabokweni Community v Unknown (Concerning White River 64 JU)LCC 155/2019
  • The Madalaskom Claimants v The Regional Land ClaimsLCC 124/2018

More South Africa cases

  • 3M South Africa (Pty) Ltd v The Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service(272/09) [2010] ZASCA 20 (23 March 2010)
  • 4 Seasons Logistics CC v Kgotse(1215/2023) [2026] ZASCA 09 (04 February 2026)
  • 4 Seasons Logistics CC v Nicholas Ngwanammoto Kgotse(1215/2023) [2026] ZASCA 09 (4 February 2026)
  • 4-Tune Investments (Pty) Ltd v Kingsgate Body CorporateCSOS 4565/WC/22 (Adjudication Order, 29 November 2023)
  • 68 Wolmarans Street Johannesburg (Pty) Ltd and Others v Tufh Limited(1263/2022) [2024] ZASCA 48 (15 April 2024)
  • 9 on Rydal Vale Court Body Corporate v Pan African Holdings Pty LtdCSOS-4563/KZN/23 (Adjudication Order, 8 November 2023)
  • AAA Investments (Proprietary) Limited v The Micro Finance Regulatory Council and Another2006 (11) BCLR 1255 (CC) (also reported as CCT 51/05)
  • A A Alloy Foundry (Pty) Limited v Titaco Projects (Pty) LimitedCase No. 309/97