CaseNotes LogoCaseNotes
  • Home
  • Library
  • Research
  • Discussion Hub
  • Wiki
  • Latin Dictionary
  • Question Bank
  • Settings
S

Student

Student Account

South African Law • Jurisdictional Corpus
HomeLibraryResearchQuestionsSettings
Judicial Precedent
Ask AI

Kabokweni Community v Unknown (Concerning White River 64 JU)

CitationLCC 155/2019
JurisdictionZA
Area of Law
Land RestitutionLand Claims
Free account

Get the most out of this judgment

Create a free CaseNotes account to save this case, see how it's cited, get an AI summary, and search 10,000+ SA judgments.

Create free accountor sign in

Facts of the Case

This is a land restitution matter before the Land Claims Court concerning the property known as White River 64 JU. The claimant is the Kabokweni Community. The matter was scheduled for case management proceedings on 28 May 2025 during Term 2, Week 7. The specific facts underlying the land claim are not detailed in this case management roll entry.

Legal Issues

  • The substantive legal issues in this land restitution claim are not specified in this case management roll entry

Judicial Outcome

No outcome is recorded in this case management roll entry. The outcome field is left blank, indicating that the matter proceeded as a case management hearing without a final or interim order being made at this stage.

Ratio Decidendi

No ratio decidendi can be extracted from this document as it is merely a case management roll entry and does not contain a substantive judgment or binding legal principles. This is a procedural administrative record, not a judgment establishing legal precedent.

Obiter Dicta

No obiter dicta are present in this document. As a case management roll entry, it contains no judicial observations, commentary, or non-binding remarks by the court.

Legal Significance

This case management roll entry does not establish any legal precedent or significance in South African jurisprudence. It is a procedural document relating to the administrative management of a pending land restitution claim. The significance of the underlying land claim, if any, cannot be determined from this document.

Practice This Case

Sign up to practise IRAC analysis, issue spotting, and argument building on this case.

Explore More Cases

More Land Restitution cases

  • Alexkor Limited and Government of the Republic of South Africa v The Richtersveld Community and OthersCCT 19/03
  • Bakgatla Ba Mocha (Maubane) and Bakgatla Ba Mocha (Phopolo Maloka) v Bakgatla Ba Mmakau Ba Mokgoko and OthersLCC 16/2020 (27 February 2025)
  • Bakgatla ba Mocha (Maubane); Bakgatla ba Mocha (Phopolo Maloka) v Bakgatla ba Mmakau ba MokgokoLCC 16/2020
  • Baphalane Ba Ramokoka Community v Mphela Family and Others[2011] ZACC 15
  • Emfuleni Resorts (Pty) Ltd and Another v Mazizini Community and Others(655/2010) [2011] ZASCA 139 (23 September 2011)
  • Florence v Government of the Republic of South Africa[2014] ZACC 22
  • Kranspoort Community v Dutch Reformed Church of Transvaal and OthersLCC26/98 (10 December 1999)
  • Makhukhuza Community ClaimantsLCC 04/2009

More South Africa cases

  • 3M South Africa (Pty) Ltd v The Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service(272/09) [2010] ZASCA 20 (23 March 2010)
  • 4 Seasons Logistics CC v Kgotse(1215/2023) [2026] ZASCA 09 (04 February 2026)
  • 4 Seasons Logistics CC v Nicholas Ngwanammoto Kgotse(1215/2023) [2026] ZASCA 09 (4 February 2026)
  • 4-Tune Investments (Pty) Ltd v Kingsgate Body CorporateCSOS 4565/WC/22 (Adjudication Order, 29 November 2023)
  • 68 Wolmarans Street Johannesburg (Pty) Ltd and Others v Tufh Limited(1263/2022) [2024] ZASCA 48 (15 April 2024)
  • 9 on Rydal Vale Court Body Corporate v Pan African Holdings Pty LtdCSOS-4563/KZN/23 (Adjudication Order, 8 November 2023)
  • AAA Investments (Proprietary) Limited v The Micro Finance Regulatory Council and Another
2006 (11) BCLR 1255 (CC) (also reported as CCT 51/05)
  • A A Alloy Foundry (Pty) Limited v Titaco Projects (Pty) LimitedCase No. 309/97