Explore 16 related cases • Click to navigate
Applied the principle requiring full, detailed and accurate account of the causes of delay in condonation applications.
The court cites this case as also approving the dictum from Ex Parte Daly that context is everything in law.
Cited for the proposition that this Court's exposition on permitting rectification of deficiencies in applications without censure occurred without ruling on…
Cited on the general principle of condonation for late filing when there is no prejudice.
The court applies the principle that an obligation to consult demands that the person entitled to be consulted be afforded an adequate opportunity to exercise…
The court cites this case for the principle that the duty to exhaust internal remedies defers the exercise of the court's review jurisdiction until the duty is…
This is the judgment of the Supreme Court of Appeal dismissing Dengetenge's application for condonation and reinstatement of the appeal; the appeal was…
Cited for the legal principles applicable in considering an application for condonation, including factors such as degree of non-compliance, explanation,…
Court cites Dengetenge Holdings to outline factors relevant to discretion on granting condonation, including degree of non-compliance, explanation, importance…
Applied for the proposition that even an incorrect judicial order exists in fact and may have legal consequences until a court sets it aside.
Cited for the factors that typically guide the court when considering an application for condonation, including degree of non-compliance, explanation,…
Court applies the principle that the rationality standard prescribes the lowest possible threshold.
Cited in support of the principle that interpretation should not result in an absurdity and must accord with purposive and contextualised statutory…
Cited with approval for the principle established in Bezuidenhout v Patensie Sitrus Beherend BPK that a court order stands until set aside.
Court applies the factors set out by Ponnan JA governing the discretion to grant or refuse condonation, including the degree of non-compliance, explanation,…
Court cites this case as further authority regarding the requirement for detailed explanation of delay in condonation applications.
The court applies Dengetenge Holdings to explain that s 7(2)(c) of PAJA requires an application for exemption from exhausting internal remedies and requires…
Court cites Dengetenge for the common law rule that the aggrieved party may choose to pursue internal remedies or proceed straight to court to seek review…
Cited to explain the principle that when a party abandons its opposition to an application and confines its argument to a question of law, it is effectively no…
Cited for the proposition that an exemption is granted by a court on application by the aggrieved party and that a court is precluded from reviewing challenged…
The court cites this case for the principle that an order of a court of law stands until set aside by a court of competent jurisdiction and must be obeyed even…
Cited for factors that weigh with the court in considering an application for condonation, including the degree of non-compliance, explanation, importance of…
Cited at paragraph 21 for the principle that the doctrine of legality is an aspect of the rule of law governing the exercise of all public power.
Cited for the factors a court considers when exercising discretion whether to grant condonation for non-compliance with procedural rules.
Cited for the proposition that the DMR allows applicants to supplement their applications.
Applied for the explanation of the duty to exhaust internal remedies and the circumstances in which exemption may be granted.
Cited in support of the principle that context is everything in interpretation.
Applied to set out the factors considered by a court when exercising discretion whether to grant condonation.
Cited for the principle that legislation must be interpreted purposively.
Court applied the principle that an appeal which has lapsed due to non-compliance with court rules can only be revived through an application for condonation.
Applied for the principle that both the process and the decision must be rational, and that a failure to consider relevant factors can render a decision…
Court cites the case for the principle that joinder of a party is only required as a matter of necessity if that party has a direct and substantial interest…
Cited for the factors that usually weigh with the court in considering an application for condonation, including degree of non-compliance, explanation…
Cited for the well-established requirements for condonation and reinstatement.
Applied for the principle that a party cannot on appeal seek to advance a case specifically abandoned in the court below.
Applied for the rationality test in review: that means must be rationally related to the purpose for which the power was conferred, and both the process and…
Court follows the principle that an order of a court of law stands until set aside by a court of competent jurisdiction, as quoted in Minister of Home Affairs