CaseNotes LogoCaseNotes
  • Home
  • Library
  • Research
  • Discussion Hub
  • Wiki
  • Latin Dictionary
  • Question Bank
  • Settings
S

Student

Student Account

South African Law • Jurisdictional Corpus
HomeLibraryResearchQuestionsSettings
Judicial Precedent
Ask AI

Trustees of Akasia Body Corporate v GA Monareng

CitationCSOS010138/GP/23 (Adjudication Order, 20 March 2024)
JurisdictionZA
Area of Law
Community Schemes LawSectional Titles Law
Free account

Get the most out of this judgment

Create a free CaseNotes account to save this case, see how it's cited, get an AI summary, and search 10,000+ SA judgments.

Create free accountor sign in
Body Corporate Levy Recovery
Statutory Dispute Resolution

Facts of the Case

The applicant, the Trustees of Akasia Body Corporate, is the body corporate of a sectional title scheme governed by the Sectional Titles Schemes Management Act 8 of 2011 and constituting a community scheme under the Community Schemes Ombud Service Act 9 of 2011. The respondent, GA Monareng, is the registered owner of section 59 in the scheme. The body corporate alleged that the respondent failed or neglected to pay monthly levies and ancillary charges, including monthly CSOS levies, due in respect of the unit. The applicant submitted a statement of account showing an alleged indebtedness of R75 513.14 as at 1 February 2024. The respondent did not file any response or submissions despite correspondence from CSOS. The matter proceeded on the papers and was adjudicated under section 39(1)(e) of the CSOS Act for payment of an amount due.

Legal Issues

  • Whether the respondent, as owner of a unit in the sectional title scheme, was liable to the body corporate for outstanding levies and ancillary charges.
  • Whether the applicant had proved on a balance of probabilities that the respondent was indebted in the sum of R75 513.14.
  • Whether the adjudicator should grant relief under section 39(1)(e) of the CSOS Act for payment of the outstanding amount.
  • Whether payment should be ordered immediately or by way of instalments, and on what terms.

Judicial Outcome

The application was granted. The adjudicator declared that the respondent is indebted to the applicant in the amount of R75 513.14 in respect of levies and ancillary charges as at 1 February 2024. The respondent was ordered to pay that amount in 24 equal monthly instalments of R3 146.38, commencing on 1 April 2024 and thereafter on the first day of each succeeding month. No interest would accrue during the permitted payment period. The order does not affect the respondent's ongoing liability for regular monthly levies and ancillary charges. If the respondent defaults on any instalment, the full outstanding amount becomes immediately due and payable. There was no order as to costs.

Ratio Decidendi

A body corporate in a sectional title scheme is entitled to require owners to pay levies and ancillary contributions lawfully raised under the STSMA and the scheme rules. Where the body corporate places sufficient documentary evidence before the adjudicator showing arrear contributions, and the owner provides no answering version, the adjudicator may find on a balance of probabilities that the debt is due and make an order under section 39(1)(e) of the CSOS Act for payment of that amount. The adjudicator may also regulate the manner of payment by instalments without extinguishing the underlying liability.

Obiter Dicta

The adjudicator remarked that owners who default on levy payments are effectively subsidised by compliant members of the body corporate, and that the body corporate cannot perform its statutory functions and duties in the absence of contributions from unit owners. These observations explain the practical importance of levy enforcement but were not independently necessary to the dispositive finding on the proven indebtedness.

Legal Significance

This decision illustrates the CSOS's role in enforcing levy obligations within sectional title schemes through section 39(1)(e) of the CSOS Act. It reaffirms that unit owners are legally obliged to pay body corporate levies and ancillary charges necessary for the functioning of the scheme, and that uncontested documentary proof of indebtedness may suffice to obtain relief. The order is also significant for showing that CSOS adjudicators may grant pragmatic payment arrangements, including instalments and temporary suspension of interest, while still vindicating the body corporate's right to recover arrears.

Practice This Case

Sign up to practise IRAC analysis, issue spotting, and argument building on this case.

Explore More Cases

More Community Schemes Law cases

  • 4-Tune Investments (Pty) Ltd v Kingsgate Body CorporateCSOS 4565/WC/22 (Adjudication Order, 29 November 2023)
  • 9 on Rydal Vale Court Body Corporate v Pan African Holdings Pty LtdCSOS-4563/KZN/23 (Adjudication Order, 8 November 2023)
  • Abrahm Bore v The Trustees of Loeries Park Body CorporateCSOS9164/GP/22 (Adjudication Order, 25 July 2022)
  • Agostini obo Firlands Park Home Owners' Association v Trustees for the time being of Rory Bamber TrustCSOS Adjudication Order Ref: CSOS7311/WC/23 (7 December 2023)
  • Ahmed Sadeck Mansoor obo Al Zakhura v Mont Blanc Body CorporateCSOS5288/KZN/22; adjudication order dated 13 January 2023
  • Akasia Body Corporate v Matodzi MukwevhoCSOS 10243/GP/23 (Adjudication Order, 11 April 2024)
  • Akasia Body Corporate v MF & H MashiyaCSOS 10233/GP/23 (Adjudication Order, 11 April 2024)
  • Akasia Body Corporate v RFL RodriquesCSOS 10242/GP/23 (Adjudication Order, 11 April 2024)

More South Africa cases

  • 3M South Africa (Pty) Ltd v The Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service(272/09) [2010] ZASCA 20 (23 March 2010)
  • 4 Seasons Logistics CC v Kgotse(1215/2023) [2026] ZASCA 09 (04 February 2026)
  • 4 Seasons Logistics CC v Nicholas Ngwanammoto Kgotse(1215/2023) [2026] ZASCA 09 (4 February 2026)
  • 4-Tune Investments (Pty) Ltd v Kingsgate Body CorporateCSOS 4565/WC/22 (Adjudication Order, 29 November 2023)
  • 68 Wolmarans Street Johannesburg (Pty) Ltd and Others v Tufh Limited(1263/2022) [2024] ZASCA 48 (15 April 2024)
  • 9 on Rydal Vale Court Body Corporate v Pan African Holdings Pty LtdCSOS-4563/KZN/23 (Adjudication Order, 8 November 2023)
  • AAA Investments (Proprietary) Limited v The Micro Finance Regulatory Council and Another
2006 (11) BCLR 1255 (CC) (also reported as CCT 51/05)
  • A A Alloy Foundry (Pty) Limited v Titaco Projects (Pty) LimitedCase No. 309/97