The applicant, The Trustees of Lytern Court Body Corporate, is the body corporate of a sectional title scheme and a community scheme under the Community Schemes Ombud Service Act 9 of 2011 (CSOS Act). The respondent, Monyamane M.T.M., is the registered owner of unit 18 in the scheme. The body corporate alleged that the respondent's levy account was consistently in arrears, that he failed to bring his levies up to date, and that he did not negotiate any payment arrangement despite arrear reminders, a final demand, and notice that the matter would be referred to the CSOS. The applicant, through its managing agent acting under written authority from the trustees, sought an order for payment of the outstanding levies and ancillary charges. It produced a signed mandate and an up-to-date levy history statement. The respondent filed no submissions and did not dispute the claim. The amount claimed and accepted by the adjudicator was R44 667.82, inclusive of levies, CSOS levies, and interest, outstanding up to and including February 2024.
Application upheld. The adjudicator found for the applicant and ordered that the respondent owes the applicant R44 667.82 in respect of levies and ancillary amounts, including CSOS levies and interest, up to and including February 2024. The amount is payable in 10 equal monthly instalments of R4 466.78 commencing on 1 May 2024, with the remaining instalments due on the first day of each consecutive month from 1 June 2024 until payment in full. The order states that interest is already included, that the order does not affect ongoing monthly levies and ancillary payments, and that if the respondent defaults on any one payment, the full balance becomes immediately due and payable. There was no order as to costs.
A body corporate in a sectional title scheme is statutorily entitled under the STSMA and the CSOS Act to require owners to pay levies and ancillary charges and to seek a CSOS order for repayment of arrears under section 39(1)(e). Where the body corporate places uncontested documentary proof before the adjudicator, and the owner files no response, the adjudicator may accept that evidence and find on a balance of probabilities that the debt is due. Interest on overdue amounts may lawfully form part of the recoverable debt where charged pursuant to a trustee resolution under the prescribed management rules.
The adjudicator observed that owners who fail to pay levies are effectively subsidised by other owners and that the body corporate cannot perform its statutory functions without contributions from unit owners. The adjudicator also noted, with reference to case law, that interest on arrears is not a penalty but serves to compensate for the time value of money and inflation. These remarks provide policy context for enforcing levy obligations but were not strictly necessary beyond supporting the conclusion that the arrears and interest were recoverable.
This decision is a straightforward but important application of the CSOS dispute-resolution framework to levy arrears in sectional title schemes. It reinforces that body corporates may use section 39(1)(e) of the CSOS Act to recover unpaid levies and ancillary charges from defaulting owners, and that where an owner fails to respond, the adjudicator may accept the body corporate's properly supported version on a balance of probabilities. The order also illustrates the interaction between the CSOS Act, the Sectional Titles Schemes Management Act, and prescribed management rules governing interest on arrears. In practical terms, it confirms the enforceability of levy obligations and the legitimacy of structured repayment orders in community scheme disputes.