The applicant, The Directors of Spekboom Home Owners Association, brought a dispute-resolution application under section 38 of the Community Schemes Ombud Service Act 9 of 2011 (CSOS Act) against the respondent, L. Mokoena, the owner of unit 5380 in the Spekboom Home Owners Association. The applicant alleged that the respondent had failed to pay levies due to the association and was in arrears in the amount of R2 240,64 as reflected on the latest statement calculated to 1 August 2023. The HOA relied on its Memorandum of Incorporation, particularly articles 9.1 and 9.3, which authorised the directors to determine levies and required levies to be paid monthly in advance on the first day of each month. The respondent did not file any response or opposing submissions despite being invited by CSOS to do so. A certificate of non-resolution was issued and the matter proceeded to adjudication on the papers.
The application was upheld. The respondent was ordered to pay the applicant outstanding levies of R2 240,64 within 2 months, in 2 equal instalments of R1 120,32 commencing on 1 September 2023 and the final instalment on 1 October 2023. The order did not affect the respondent's ongoing obligation to pay regular monthly levies and ancillary charges. If the respondent defaulted on one instalment, the full outstanding amount would become immediately due and payable. No order as to costs was made.
Where a homeowners' association's constitutive documents authorise the imposition of levies and require members to pay them, and the association proves on a balance of probabilities that an owner is in arrears, CSOS may grant an order under section 39(1)(e) of the CSOS Act compelling payment of the outstanding levies. Membership of the HOA binds the owner contractually to its rules and levy obligations.
The adjudicator's references to the general approach to relevance, credibility, probabilities, and the respondent appearing unwilling to pay were explanatory observations rather than necessary independent legal holdings. The discussion of the right of appeal under section 57 of the CSOS Act was also informational and not part of the ratio.
This adjudication illustrates the CSOS's power under section 39(1)(e) of the CSOS Act to enforce payment of levies in community schemes. It reinforces the South African legal position that an owner's liability to pay levies in a homeowners' association is contractual and arises from the scheme's constitutive documents. The case is also an example of CSOS adjudication on the papers where a respondent defaults, showing that uncontroverted documentary proof of arrears may suffice for relief.