CaseNotes LogoCaseNotes
  • Home
  • Library
  • Research
  • Discussion Hub
  • Wiki
  • Latin Dictionary
  • Question Bank
  • Settings
S

Student

Student Account

South African Law • Jurisdictional Corpus
HomeLibraryResearchQuestionsSettings
Judicial Precedent
Ask AI

Tadvest Industrial (Pty) Ltd v Johanna (Elsie) Malan and Others

CitationCase No: LCC30R/2019 (Magistrate's Court Case No: 757/2017)
JurisdictionZA
Area of Law
Land LawExtension of Security of Tenure Act (ESTA)
Free account

Get the most out of this judgment

Create a free CaseNotes account to save this case, see how it's cited, get an AI summary, and search 10,000+ SA judgments.

Create free accountor sign in

Facts of the Case

This case was heard in the Land Claims Court of South Africa in Randburg. The applicant was Tadvest Industrial (Pty) Ltd, and the respondents were Johanna (Elsie) Malan and four other members of the Malan family (Dorothy Malan, Charmaine Malan, Moses Malam, and Jacobus Malan). The matter appears to have originated from the Magistrate's Court under case number 757/2017 before being brought to the Land Claims Court. The specific factual circumstances giving rise to the dispute are not detailed in the extracted judgment heading.

Legal Issues

  • The specific legal issues cannot be determined from the judgment excerpt provided, though the matter was heard in the Land Claims Court which has jurisdiction over land rights and tenure security matters

Judicial Outcome

The final order of the court cannot be determined from the excerpt provided, as only the case heading and administrative details are included in the text.

Ratio Decidendi

The binding legal principle established by this case cannot be determined from the excerpt provided, as the substantive judgment text is not included.

Obiter Dicta

No obiter dicta can be identified from the excerpt provided, as only the case heading and preliminary administrative information is included in the text.

Legal Significance

The significance of this case cannot be determined from the limited excerpt provided. However, as a Land Claims Court matter, it likely relates to important questions of land rights and tenure security under South African land reform legislation.

Practice This Case

Sign up to practise IRAC analysis, issue spotting, and argument building on this case.

Explore More Cases

More Land Law cases

  • Abahlali baseMjondolo Movement SA and Another v Premier of the Province of KwaZulu-Natal and Others(CCT 12/09) [2009] ZACC 31
  • Abednico Tsamwise v Minister of Lands, Agriculture, Water, Climate and Rural Settlement and Wellington Maruma and Zimbabwe Land CommissionHH 705-22, HC 801/22
  • Adendorffs Boerderye (Pty) Ltd v Fayindolo Shabalala & others(997/15) [2017] ZASCA 37 (29 March 2017)
  • Agrico Masjinerie (Edms) Bpk v Swiers(399/06) [2007] ZASCA 84
  • AJB Trust and AJ Behrens v Solomon Sello Boiyane and Johannes SegoneCase No: LCC 102/2011 and LCC 103/2011
  • Alan McGregor v Nehemiah Saburi and OthersHH 33-11, HC 7748/10
  • Alfred Pietersen v Rainbow Farms (Pty) LtdLCC08/2014 (decided 24 April 2014)
  • Alice Sunga & 32 Others v Deron MutengwaHH 68-2007; HC 64/07

More South Africa cases

  • 3M South Africa (Pty) Ltd v The Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service(272/09) [2010] ZASCA 20 (23 March 2010)
  • 4 Seasons Logistics CC v Kgotse(1215/2023) [2026] ZASCA 09 (04 February 2026)
  • 4 Seasons Logistics CC v Nicholas Ngwanammoto Kgotse(1215/2023) [2026] ZASCA 09 (4 February 2026)
  • 4-Tune Investments (Pty) Ltd v Kingsgate Body CorporateCSOS 4565/WC/22 (Adjudication Order, 29 November 2023)
  • 68 Wolmarans Street Johannesburg (Pty) Ltd and Others v Tufh Limited(1263/2022) [2024] ZASCA 48 (15 April 2024)
  • 9 on Rydal Vale Court Body Corporate v Pan African Holdings Pty LtdCSOS-4563/KZN/23 (Adjudication Order, 8 November 2023)
  • AAA Investments (Proprietary) Limited v The Micro Finance Regulatory Council and Another
2006 (11) BCLR 1255 (CC) (also reported as CCT 51/05)
  • A A Alloy Foundry (Pty) Limited v Titaco Projects (Pty) LimitedCase No. 309/97