CaseNotes LogoCaseNotes
  • Home
  • Library
  • Research
  • Discussion Hub
  • Wiki
  • Latin Dictionary
  • Question Bank
  • Settings
S

Student

Student Account

South African Law • Jurisdictional Corpus
HomeLibraryResearchQuestionsSettings
Judicial Precedent
Ask AI

Swartbooi and Others v Brink and Another

CitationCCT 27/02 (CC) (official SA Law Reports citation not provided in the judgment text)
JurisdictionZA

Facts of the Case

Data not available for this record

Legal Issues

Data not available for this record

Judicial Outcome

Data not available for this record

Ratio Decidendi

Data not available for this record

Obiter Dicta

Data not available for this record

Legal Significance

Data not available for this record

Case relationship graph

Case Network

Explore 1 related case • Click to navigate

Current Case
Related Case

Cited By 10 Cases

  • Baphalane Ba Ramokoka Community v The Minister of Agriculture and Land Affairs and OthersLCC 09/2007 (Judgment delivered 24 November 2010)
    Applies

    Applied for the principle that common law rules render an order for costs de bonis propriis appropriate if actions are motivated by malice or amount to…

  • Cloete and Another v S; Sekgala v Nedbank Limited[2018] ZACC 6
    Follows

    The Court follows Swartbooi I to hold that where the Supreme Court of Appeal refuses leave to appeal, the appeal to the Constitutional Court is against the…

Free account

Get the most out of this judgment

Create a free CaseNotes account to save this case, see how it's cited, get an AI summary, and search 10,000+ SA judgments.

Create free accountor sign in
David Dikoko v Thupi Zacharia MokhatlaCase CCT 62/05 (decided 3 August 2006)
Considers

Considered in relation to privilege under section 28 of the Municipal Structures Act covering conduct of members in full council deliberations and noting…

  • Economic Freedom Fighters v Gordhan and Others; Public Protector and Another v Gordhan and Others[2020] ZACC 10
    Cites

    Cited for the principle that public officials acting in a representative capacity may be ordered to pay costs personally in specified circumstances.

  • Gabriel Ntleli Swartbooi and Seventeen Others v Lilian Ray Brink and Others(CCT 27/02) [2003] ZACC 3
    Appeal From

    The Constitutional Court granted leave to appeal on the costs issue, joined the council as a party, and heard argument from various interested parties…

  • H E T H Mabaso v The Law Society of the Northern Provinces and Minister for Justice and Constitutional DevelopmentCase CCT 76/03, decided on 5 October 2004
    Cites

    Cited to confirm the jurisprudence under the earlier rules that an appeal lies against the High Court decision when the President of the SCA refuses leave, and…

  • Jack Coetzee v National Commissioner of Police and Minister of Safety and Security(CCT 124/12) [2013] ZACC 29
    Cites

    Cited by the High Court as justification for its costs order.

  • [MEDIA SUMMARY] MEC for Local Government, Housing and Traditional Affairs, KwaZulu-Natal v Yengwa(147/09) [2010] ZASCA 31 (26 March 2010)
    Applies

    The SCA relied on this Constitutional Court case to conclude that the MEC was not entitled to recover legal costs from councillors in proceedings involving the…

  • The Head of Department, Department of Education, Limpopo Province v Settlers Agricultural High School and OthersCCT 36/03 (decided on 2 October 2003)
    Cites

    Cited for the principle that where the SCA refuses leave to appeal, the correct procedure is to apply for leave to appeal directly to the Constitutional Court…

  • The Helen Suzman Foundation v Judicial Service Commission(145/2015) [2015] ZASCA 161 (2 November 2016)
    Distinguishes

    Distinguished as involving a different enquiry concerning councillors' immunity from civil liability, not disclosure of deliberations under rule 53, in paras…

  • Practice This Case

    Sign up to practise IRAC analysis, issue spotting, and argument building on this case.

    Explore More Cases

    More South Africa cases

    • 3M South Africa (Pty) Ltd v The Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service(272/09) [2010] ZASCA 20 (23 March 2010)
    • 4 Seasons Logistics CC v Kgotse(1215/2023) [2026] ZASCA 09 (04 February 2026)
    • 4 Seasons Logistics CC v Nicholas Ngwanammoto Kgotse(1215/2023) [2026] ZASCA 09 (4 February 2026)
    • 4-Tune Investments (Pty) Ltd v Kingsgate Body CorporateCSOS 4565/WC/22 (Adjudication Order, 29 November 2023)
    • 68 Wolmarans Street Johannesburg (Pty) Ltd and Others v Tufh Limited(1263/2022) [2024] ZASCA 48 (15 April 2024)
    • 9 on Rydal Vale Court Body Corporate v Pan African Holdings Pty LtdCSOS-4563/KZN/23 (Adjudication Order, 8 November 2023)
    • AAA Investments (Proprietary) Limited v The Micro Finance Regulatory Council and Another2006 (11) BCLR 1255 (CC) (also reported as CCT 51/05)
    • A A Alloy Foundry (Pty) Limited v Titaco Projects (Pty) LimitedCase No. 309/97