CaseNotes LogoCaseNotes
  • Home
  • Library
  • Research
  • Discussion Hub
  • Wiki
  • Latin Dictionary
  • Question Bank
  • Settings
S

Student

Student Account

South African Law • Jurisdictional Corpus
HomeLibraryResearchQuestionsSettings
Judicial Precedent
Ask AI

S v Lawrence; S v Negal; S v Solberg

Citation[1997] ZACC 11; 1997 (4) SA 1176 (CC); 1997 (10) BCLR 1348 (CC)
JurisdictionZA
Area of Law
Constitutional LawFreedom of Religion

Facts of the Case

Data not available for this record

Legal Issues

Data not available for this record

Judicial Outcome

Data not available for this record

Ratio Decidendi

Data not available for this record

Obiter Dicta

Data not available for this record

Legal Significance

Data not available for this record

Cited By 29 Cases

  • C and Others v Department of Health and Social Development, Gauteng and Others(CCT 55/11) [2012] ZACC 1
    Cites

    Cited by Jafta J for the principle that in applications declaring legislation invalid, the onus is on the applicant to prove inconsistency with the…

  • Christian Education South Africa v Minister of Education2000 (10) BCLR 1051 (CC); CCT 4/00
    Cites

    Cited for the definition of freedom of religion as articulated by Chaskalson P, covering belief, declaration, and practice.

  • Democratic Alliance v President of the Republic of South Africa and Others(CCT 122/11) [2012] ZACC 24
    Cites

    Cited for the proposition that rationality test achieves a proper balance between the roles of the legislature and the courts.

  • Elsie Gundwana v Steko Development CC and Others(CCT 44/10) [2011] ZACC 14
    Cites

    Cited for the requirements for admission of evidence by amicus curiae.

  • Gareth Anver Prince v The President of the Law Society of the Cape of Good Hope and OthersCase No: 220/98 (Supreme Court of Appeal)
    Cites

    Cited for the principle that a court cannot legislate by creating exemptions not provided for in legislation, and can only strike down unconstitutional…

  • Glenister v President of the Republic of South Africa and Others(CCT 48/10) [2011] ZACC 6
    Cites

    Cited to support the principle that courts do not disturb political judgments.

  • Grace Chrissie Nkosi and Joseph Mandla Nkosi v Gideon Wilhelmus BührmannCase No 1/2000, Supreme Court of Appeal (Reportable)
    Cites

    Cited for the definition of the right to freedom of religion including the right to manifest religious belief by worship and practice.

  • Independent Outdoor Media (Pty) Ltd and Others v The City of Cape Town
    Cites

    Cited for the proposition that if legislation has a rational legislative purpose which is not arbitrary, the courts cannot interfere with legislative function.

  • In Re Certain Amicus Curiae Applications (relating to Minister of Health and Others v Treatment Action Campaign and Others)CCT 8/02 (judgment dated 5 July 2002)
    Cites

    The Court cites this case for the principle that a genuine dispute as to the facts demonstrates that they are not incontrovertible or capable of easy…

  • Joaquim Augusto De Freitas and Independent Association of Advocates of South Africa v Society of Advocates of Natal and Natal Law SocietyCase no: 120/99
    Cites

    Cited for the proposition that regulation of professional practice must be rational and non-arbitrary to pass constitutional scrutiny.

  • Jordan and Others v The State2002 (6) SA 642 (CC); 2002 (11) BCLR 1117 (CC); Case CCT 31/01
    Considers

    Considered for the interpretation of section 26 of the interim Constitution relating to the right to freely engage in economic activity and the two possible…

  • Jordan and Others v The StateCCT 31/01
    Applies

    Applied to interpret section 26 of the interim Constitution on the right to engage in economic activity, and to adopt the approach that section 26(2) permits…

  • Madrasah Taleemuddeen Islamic Institute v Chandra Giri Ellaurie and Another(755/2021) [2022] ZASCA 160 (24 November 2022)
    Cites

    Cited via Christian Education for the meaning of freedom of religion under the interim Constitution, including the right to declare and manifest religious…

  • Mario Gaspare Oriani-Ambrosini, MP v Maxwell Vuyisile Sisulu, MP Speaker of the National Assembly(CCT 16/12) [2012] ZACC 27
    Cites

    Cited for the function of the Constitution to protect fundamental rights of non-majoritarian groups.

  • Member of the Executive Council, Department of Education, Eastern Cape v Komani School & Office Suppliers CC, t/a Komani Stationers(1417/2018) [2022] ZASCA 13 (26 January 2022)
    Cites

    Cited for the principle regarding appeal records as understood by the practice of courts.

  • Merafong Demarcation Forum and Others v President of the Republic of South Africa and Others[2008] ZACC 10
    Cites

    Cited with approval on the standard of judicial review of legislation and the principle of not substituting judicial opinion for legislative judgement.

  • Minister of Health and Professor D McIntyre NO v New Clicks South Africa (Pty) Ltd and OthersCCT 59/04; 2005 (2) SA 530 (CC)
    Cites

    Cited for requirement that exercise of power must be lawful and properly related to governmental purpose

  • Mobile Telephone Networks (Pty) Limited v SMI Trading CC(603/2011) [2012] ZASCA 138 (28 September 2012)
    Cites

    Cited for the principle that arbitrariness is inconsistent with the values of an open and democratic society based on freedom and equality.

  • Pretorius v The State(145/2008) [2008] ZASCA 132 (26 November 2008)
    Cites

    Cited as an example of a sentence of four years' imprisonment for fraud against an employer committed over a long period, confirming consistency with the…

  • Prophet v National Director of Public Prosecutions(CCT 56/05) [2006] ZACC 17
    Applies

    Applied in respect of the requirements for the admission of further evidence under rule 31 and the need for an explanation for lateness.

  • Rail Commuters Action Group and Others v Transnet Ltd t/a Metrorail and Others2004 CCT 56/03
    Applies

    Applies holding that rule 19 deals with preparation of appeal record, not introduction of new evidence on appeal, and that rule 34 has no application to…

  • Shoprite Checkers (Pty) Limited v Member of the Executive Council for Economic Development, Environmental Affairs and Tourism: Eastern Cape and Others[2015] ZACC 23
    Cites

    The Court cites Lawrence for the discussion of legislative facts and the level of proof courts should require when scrutinising legislative decisions on policy…

  • Simon Prophet v The National Director of Public ProsecutionsCase CCT 56/05 (Constitutional Court, judgment delivered 29 September 2006)
    Applies

    The Court applies this case's discussion on the application of rule 31 for the admission of further evidence.

  • South African Diamond Producers Organisation v Minister of Minerals and Energy N.O. and Others[2017] ZACC 26
    Applies

    Court applies the rationality test from Lawrence requiring a rational connection between means and ends for regulation of practice of trade, occupation or…

  • State v Saeed(432/05) [2006] ZASCA 43
    Cites

    Cited as authority for the imposition of custodial sentences for offences involving breach of trust.

  • The Affordable Medicines Trust and Others v The Minister of Health of the Republic of South Africa and Others(CCT 27/04) [2005] ZACC 3
    Applies

    Applied the rational basis test to determine permissible regulation of economic activity under section 26(2) of the Interim Constitution.

  • The City Council of Pretoria v WalkerCCT 8/97; 1998 (2) SA 363 (CC); 1998 (3) BCLR 257 (CC)
    Cites

    Cited for discussion of objective versus subjective approaches to impairment of dignity in the context of South Africa's divided and inequitable society.

  • The National Coalition for Gay and Lesbian Equality and the South African Human Rights Commission v The Minister of Justice and OthersCCT 11/98 [Decided on 9 October 1998]
    Cites

    Cited by Sachs J on the state not imposing orthodoxies of belief systems on society.

  • The National Coalition for Gay and Lesbian Equality v The Minister of JusticeCCT 11/98, decided on 9 October 1998
    Cites

    Cited for the principle that while the Constitution protects the right of people to hold beliefs, it does not allow the state to turn these beliefs into dogma…

Explore More Cases

More Constitutional Law cases

  • (1) Petros Makaza (2) Golden Nhika v The State and (1) Khumbuzo Gumbo (2) Sydney Ndachengedzwa v The StateCCZ 16/17 (Const. Application No. CCZ 5/13 and Const. Application No. CCZ 102/13)
  • (1) Tungamirai Madzokere (2) Lazarus Maengahama (3) Stanford Maengahama (4) Phineous Nhatarikwa (5) Stanford Mangwiro (6) Yvonne Musarurwa (7) Rebecca Mafukeni v The StateSC 8/12; Civil Application No. 318/11
  • 68 Wolmarans Street Johannesburg (Pty) Ltd and Others v Tufh Limited(1263/2022) [2024] ZASCA 48 (15 April 2024)
  • AAA Investments (Proprietary) Limited v The Micro Finance Regulatory Council and Another2006 (11) BCLR 1255 (CC) (also reported as CCT 51/05)
  • Aaron Musiteyi v The StateHMT 2-21, B 09/21
  • Abahlali baseMjondolo Movement SA and Another v Premier of the Province of KwaZulu-Natal and Others(CCT 12/09) [2009] ZACC 31
  • AB and Another v Minister of Social Development[2016] ZACC 43
  • AB and Another v Pridwin Preparatory School and Others[2020] ZACC 12

More South Africa cases

  • 3M South Africa (Pty) Ltd v The Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service(272/09) [2010] ZASCA 20 (23 March 2010)
  • 4 Seasons Logistics CC v Kgotse(1215/2023) [2026] ZASCA 09 (04 February 2026)
  • 4 Seasons Logistics CC v Nicholas Ngwanammoto Kgotse(1215/2023) [2026] ZASCA 09 (4 February 2026)
  • 4-Tune Investments (Pty) Ltd v Kingsgate Body CorporateCSOS 4565/WC/22 (Adjudication Order, 29 November 2023)
  • 68 Wolmarans Street Johannesburg (Pty) Ltd and Others v Tufh Limited(1263/2022) [2024] ZASCA 48 (15 April 2024)
  • 9 on Rydal Vale Court Body Corporate v Pan African Holdings Pty LtdCSOS-4563/KZN/23 (Adjudication Order, 8 November 2023)
  • AAA Investments (Proprietary) Limited v The Micro Finance Regulatory Council and Another2006 (11) BCLR 1255 (CC) (also reported as CCT 51/05)
  • A A Alloy Foundry (Pty) Limited v Titaco Projects (Pty) LimitedCase No. 309/97

Practice This Case

Sign up to practise IRAC analysis, issue spotting, and argument building on this case.

Free account

Get the most out of this judgment

Create a free CaseNotes account to save this case, see how it's cited, get an AI summary, and search 10,000+ SA judgments.

Create free accountor sign in