CaseNotes LogoCaseNotes
  • Home
  • Library
  • Research
  • Discussion Hub
  • Wiki
  • Latin Dictionary
  • Question Bank
  • Settings
S

Student

Student Account

South African Law • Jurisdictional Corpus
HomeLibraryResearchQuestionsSettings
Judicial Precedent
Ask AI

Reyno View Body Corporate v Jeffrey Lindokuhle Gumede

CitationCSOS 8184/MP/23 (Adjudication Order, 23 April 2024)
JurisdictionZA
Area of Law
Community Schemes LawSectional Titles/Body Corporate Disputes
Free account

Get the most out of this judgment

Create a free CaseNotes account to save this case, see how it's cited, get an AI summary, and search 10,000+ SA judgments.

Create free accountor sign in
Alternative Dispute Resolution

Facts of the Case

The Community Schemes Ombud Service (CSOS) received an application for dispute resolution on 2 October 2023 brought by Reyno View Body Corporate against Jeffrey Lindokuhle Gumede. The matter was adjudicated under the amended Practice Directive for Dispute Resolution, 2019, and the parties were afforded an opportunity to file final written submissions. Before determination of the merits, the applicant requested withdrawal of the application insofar as it concerned arrear levies, stating that the issue was being pursued in another forum. This was confirmed by Blue Dot Properties, the managing agent, in correspondence dated 23 April 2024.

Legal Issues

  • Whether the adjudication should proceed where the applicant seeks withdrawal of the dispute relating to arrear levies because it is being pursued in another forum.
  • What procedural order should be made by the adjudicator in the circumstances.

Judicial Outcome

The matter was removed from the roll and the file was closed.

Ratio Decidendi

Where the applicant indicates that the dispute, specifically the claim concerning arrear levies, is being pursued in another forum and seeks withdrawal, the CSOS adjudicator may make a procedural order removing the matter from the roll and closing the file rather than adjudicating the merits.

Obiter Dicta

No substantive obiter dicta appear from the text. The order is brief and purely procedural, with no wider non-binding observations on the law.

Legal Significance

The order illustrates the CSOS adjudicative practice where a dispute is not decided on the merits if the applicant elects not to proceed and indicates that the issue is being pursued in another forum. It is procedurally significant rather than jurisprudentially substantive, as it contains no developed legal reasoning on the underlying levy dispute.

Explore More Cases

More Community Schemes Law cases

  • 4-Tune Investments (Pty) Ltd v Kingsgate Body CorporateCSOS 4565/WC/22 (Adjudication Order, 29 November 2023)
  • 9 on Rydal Vale Court Body Corporate v Pan African Holdings Pty LtdCSOS-4563/KZN/23 (Adjudication Order, 8 November 2023)
  • Abrahm Bore v The Trustees of Loeries Park Body CorporateCSOS9164/GP/22 (Adjudication Order, 25 July 2022)
  • Agostini obo Firlands Park Home Owners' Association v Trustees for the time being of Rory Bamber TrustCSOS Adjudication Order Ref: CSOS7311/WC/23 (7 December 2023)
  • Ahmed Sadeck Mansoor obo Al Zakhura v Mont Blanc Body CorporateCSOS5288/KZN/22; adjudication order dated 13 January 2023
  • Akasia Body Corporate v Matodzi Mukwevho

Practice This Case

Sign up to practise IRAC analysis, issue spotting, and argument building on this case.

CSOS 10243/GP/23 (Adjudication Order, 11 April 2024)
  • Akasia Body Corporate v MF & H MashiyaCSOS 10233/GP/23 (Adjudication Order, 11 April 2024)
  • Akasia Body Corporate v RFL RodriquesCSOS 10242/GP/23 (Adjudication Order, 11 April 2024)
  • More South Africa cases

    • 3M South Africa (Pty) Ltd v The Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service(272/09) [2010] ZASCA 20 (23 March 2010)
    • 4 Seasons Logistics CC v Kgotse(1215/2023) [2026] ZASCA 09 (04 February 2026)
    • 4 Seasons Logistics CC v Nicholas Ngwanammoto Kgotse(1215/2023) [2026] ZASCA 09 (4 February 2026)
    • 4-Tune Investments (Pty) Ltd v Kingsgate Body CorporateCSOS 4565/WC/22 (Adjudication Order, 29 November 2023)
    • 68 Wolmarans Street Johannesburg (Pty) Ltd and Others v Tufh Limited(1263/2022) [2024] ZASCA 48 (15 April 2024)
    • 9 on Rydal Vale Court Body Corporate v Pan African Holdings Pty LtdCSOS-4563/KZN/23 (Adjudication Order, 8 November 2023)
    • AAA Investments (Proprietary) Limited v The Micro Finance Regulatory Council and Another2006 (11) BCLR 1255 (CC) (also reported as CCT 51/05)
    • A A Alloy Foundry (Pty) Limited v Titaco Projects (Pty) LimitedCase No. 309/97