CaseNotes LogoCaseNotes
  • Home
  • Library
  • Research
  • Discussion Hub
  • Wiki
  • Latin Dictionary
  • Question Bank
  • Settings
S

Student

Student Account

South African Law • Jurisdictional Corpus
HomeLibraryResearchQuestionsSettings
Judicial Precedent
Ask AI

National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals v Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development and others

JurisdictionZA

Facts of the Case

Data not available for this record

Legal Issues

Data not available for this record

Judicial Outcome

Data not available for this record

Ratio Decidendi

Data not available for this record

Obiter Dicta

Data not available for this record

Legal Significance

Data not available for this record

Cases Cited in This Judgment

  • Alix Jean Carmichele v The Minister of Safety and Security and The Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development2001 (4) SA 938 (CC)
    Cites

    Cited for the principle that a party must make its case in its papers in motion proceedings.

  • Barkhuizen v Napier(CCT 72/05) [2007] ZACC 5
    Cites

    Cited for the principle regarding the purpose of pleadings in setting out issues for the parties and the court.

  • Bertie Van Zyl (Pty) Ltd and Another v Minister for Safety and Security and Others[2009] ZACC 11
    Cites

    Cited for the principle that judicial officers must prefer interpretations of legislation that fall within constitutional bounds over those that do not.

  • Chumlong Lemthongthai v The State(849/2013) [2014] ZASCA 131 (25 September 2014)
    Cites

    Cited for the proposition that the care and protection of animals is situated within the ambit of the Constitution, and that constitutional values dictate a…

  • City of Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality v Link Africa (Pty) Limited and Others[2015] ZACC 29
    Cites

    Cited for the principle that the text of a provision is the starting point in interpretation, but textual meaning is always informed by context.

  • Commercial Workers' Union of South Africa v Tao Ying Metal Industries(CCT 40/07) [2008] ZACC 15
    Applies

    Applied for the principle that where a point of law is apparent on the papers but parties proceed on a wrong perception of the law, a court is entitled and…

  • Daniels v Campbell NO and OthersCCT 40/03; 2004 (5) SA 331 (CC); 2004 (7) BCLR 735 (CC)
    Cites

    Cited for the proposition that where a legislative provision is challenged on the basis it violates a Bill of Rights right, this Court has jurisdiction.

  • Department of Land Affairs and Others v Goedgelegen Tropical Fruits (Pty) LtdCCT 69/06, 2007 (6) SA 199 (CC)
    Cites

    Cited for the principle of purposive interpretation, identifying mischief, and paying attention to social and historical background of legislation.

  • Director of Public Prosecutions, Transvaal v Minister for Justice and Constitutional Development and Others[2009] ZACC 8
    Cites

    Cited for the principles regarding when courts may adjudicate on issues not expressly pleaded, and that courts should adjudicate on live disputes.

  • Fose v Minister of Safety and SecurityCCT 14/96; 1997 (3) SA 786 (CC); 1997 (7) BCLR 851 (CC)
    Cites

    Cited for the principle that it is prudent not to anticipate a question of constitutional law in advance of the necessity of deciding it.

  • KwaZulu-Natal Joint Liaison Committee v Member of the Executive Council, Department of Education, KwaZulu-Natal and Others[2013] ZACC 10
    Cites

    Cited for the principle that this Court has previously adopted remedies where a claim is apparent from papers and evidence even if not expressly advanced, and…

  • Lawyers for Human Rights and Another v Minister of Home Affairs and Another(CCT 18/03) [2004] ZACC 12
    Cites

    Cited for the principle that courts may adopt remedies where a claim is apparent from the papers and evidence.

  • Mankayi v Anglogold Ashanti Ltd(126/2009) [2010] ZASCA 46
    Cites

    Cited for the proposition that an applicant seeking leave to appeal must plausibly assert some constitutional value or right implicated in the case.

  • Minister for Safety and Security v Gary Walter Van Der Merwe and Others[2011] ZACC 19
    Cites

    Cited for the principle that the Court may make any just and equitable order under section 172(1) of the Constitution.

  • National Council of Societies for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals v Openshaw(462/07) [2008] ZASCA 78 (30 May 2008)
    Cites

    Cited for recognising that animals are sentient beings capable of suffering and pain, and for describing the NSPCA as a public body with wide and singular…

  • National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals v Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development(20781/2014) [2015] ZASCA 206
    Appeal From

    Appeal from the High Court's decision dismissing the NSPCA's constitutional challenge to section 7(1)(a) of the CPA; appeal upheld and High Court order set…

  • National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals v Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development and Another[2016] ZACC 46
    Appeal From

    The Constitutional Court granted leave to appeal and upheld the appeal. During oral submissions, the NSPCA advanced an alternative argument based on section 8…

  • Premier: Limpopo Province v Speaker: Limpopo Provincial Legislature and Others(CCT 94/10) [2011] ZACC 25
    Cites

    Cited for the interpretation of 'express' and 'expressly' in legislation, and that the meaning a word has is coloured by context.

  • South African Transport and Allied Workers Union and Another v Garvas and Others; Congress of South African Trade Unions intervening; Freedom of Expression Institute as Amicus Curiae(CCT 112/11) [2012] ZACC 13
    Cites

    Cited for the principle of contextual interpretation of legislation.

  • The State v Sipho Zakele NtseleCCT 25/97 (decided 14 October 1997)
    Cites

    Cited for the principle that judicial officers must prefer interpretations of legislation that fall within constitutional bounds.

  • Urmilla Roshnee Devi Mansingh v General Council of the Bar(CCT 43/13) [2013] ZACC 40
    Cites

    Cited for the principle of contextual interpretation and that interpretation must give expression to underlying constitutional values.

  • Zantsi v Council of State, Ciskei and Others1995 (4) SA 615 (CC); 1995 (10) BCLR 1424 (CC); CCT/24/94
    Cites

    Cited for the principle that courts should adjudicate live disputes and avoid pronouncing on constitutional issues absent disputes affecting parties' rights.

Explore More Cases

More South Africa cases

  • 3M South Africa (Pty) Ltd v The Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service(272/09) [2010] ZASCA 20 (23 March 2010)
  • 4 Seasons Logistics CC v Kgotse(1215/2023) [2026] ZASCA 09 (04 February 2026)
  • 4 Seasons Logistics CC v Nicholas Ngwanammoto Kgotse(1215/2023) [2026] ZASCA 09 (4 February 2026)
  • 4-Tune Investments (Pty) Ltd v Kingsgate Body CorporateCSOS 4565/WC/22 (Adjudication Order, 29 November 2023)
  • 68 Wolmarans Street Johannesburg (Pty) Ltd and Others v Tufh Limited(1263/2022) [2024] ZASCA 48 (15 April 2024)
  • 9 on Rydal Vale Court Body Corporate v Pan African Holdings Pty LtdCSOS-4563/KZN/23 (Adjudication Order, 8 November 2023)
  • AAA Investments (Proprietary) Limited v The Micro Finance Regulatory Council and Another2006 (11) BCLR 1255 (CC) (also reported as CCT 51/05)
  • A A Alloy Foundry (Pty) Limited v Titaco Projects (Pty) LimitedCase No. 309/97

Practice This Case

Sign up to practise IRAC analysis, issue spotting, and argument building on this case.

Free account

Get the most out of this judgment

Create a free CaseNotes account to save this case, see how it's cited, get an AI summary, and search 10,000+ SA judgments.

Create free accountor sign in