Three respondents were accused in a pending criminal trial in the Pietermaritzburg Regional Court. The second and third respondents were arrested on 8 July 2003 on drug-related charges (dealing in and possession of mandrax tablets). The first respondent was arrested on 15 December 2003. On 10 December 2003, the respondents' attorney was handed a draft charge sheet containing 14 counts, three of which related to racketeering offences under the Prevention of Organised Crime Act (POCA). The National Director of Public Prosecutions (NDPP) provided written authorisation to prosecute the racketeering charges on 24 March 2004, as required by s 2(4) of POCA. A second identical charge sheet was handed to the respondents' attorney on 28 March 2004. The respondents had not yet been asked to plead. The respondents challenged the validity of the racketeering charges, arguing they had been 'charged' prior to the NDPP's written authorisation. The regional court dismissed their application on jurisdictional grounds. On review, the High Court set aside the racketeering counts, finding the NDPP's authorisation was too broad and lacked specificity. The appellant (NDPP) appealed to the Supreme Court of Appeal.