CaseNotes LogoCaseNotes
  • Home
  • Library
  • Research
  • Discussion Hub
  • Wiki
  • Latin Dictionary
  • Question Bank
  • Settings
S

Student

Student Account

South African Law • Jurisdictional Corpus
HomeLibraryResearchQuestionsSettings
Judicial Precedent
Ask AI

Minister of Environmental Affairs: National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act (10/2004): Lists of marine species that are threatened or protected, restricted activities that are prohibited and exemption from restriction

CitationGovernment Notice No. 476, Government Gazette No. 40875, 30 May 2017
JurisdictionZA
Area of Law
Environmental Law
Free account

Get the most out of this judgment

Create a free CaseNotes account to save this case, see how it's cited, get an AI summary, and search 10,000+ SA judgments.

Create free accountor sign in
Biodiversity and Conservation Law
Administrative Law
Marine and Coastal Law

Facts of the Case

This is a Government Notice published by Bomo Edith Edna Molewa, Minister of Environmental Affairs, on 30 May 2017. The notice publishes comprehensive lists of marine species that are threatened or protected in terms of section 56(1) of the National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act, 2004 (Act No. 10 of 2004). The Minister prohibits certain restricted activities in terms of section 57(2) of the Act and provides exemptions from restrictions in terms of section 57(4)(a). The notice categorizes marine species into threat levels: Critically Endangered (including Coelacanth, sawfishes, certain sharks and rays, and marine turtles), Endangered (including hammerhead sharks and sea turtles), Vulnerable (including manta rays, various sharks, marine turtles and seabirds), and Protected species (including various fish, birds, and all marine mammals). For each listed species, the notice specifies prohibited restricted activities (Column 2) and exempted activities (Column 3). General exemptions are provided for law enforcement officials, persons possessing dead specimens with proof of legal acquisition, and veterinarians. Species-specific exemptions are provided for departmental officials dealing with strandings and entanglements, and for holders of valid Marine Living Resources Act permits for specific species.

Legal Issues

  • What marine species are listed as threatened or protected under the National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act?
  • What restricted activities are prohibited in relation to listed marine species?
  • What exemptions apply to the prohibitions on restricted activities?
  • What is the scope of the Minister's powers under sections 56(1), 57(2) and 57(4) of the Biodiversity Act?
  • How do the regulations interact with permits issued under the Marine Living Resources Act?
  • What activities by departmental officials are exempted in relation to strandings and entanglements?

Judicial Outcome

The Minister published and brought into effect comprehensive lists of threatened and protected marine species with detailed prohibitions and exemptions on restricted activities. The notice provides: (1) Lists of marine species categorized as Critically Endangered, Endangered, Vulnerable, and Protected; (2) Specific prohibited activities for each listed species including hunting, capturing, possessing, transporting, trading, breeding, feeding, attracting, harassing and releasing; (3) General exemptions for law enforcement officials, persons with legally acquired dead specimens, and veterinarians; (4) Species-specific exemptions for departmental officials dealing with strandings and entanglements; (5) Exemptions for holders of valid Marine Living Resources Act permits for specific species; (6) Exemptions for scientific, conservation, management, rehabilitation, and exhibition purposes subject to specified conditions. The notice became effective upon publication on 30 May 2017.

Ratio Decidendi

The binding legal principles established are: (1) The Minister of Environmental Affairs has authority under sections 56(1), 57(2) and 57(4) of the National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act, 2004 to list marine species as threatened or protected, prohibit restricted activities, and grant exemptions; (2) Restricted activities involving listed marine species are prohibited unless specifically exempted or authorized by permit; (3) General exemptions apply to law enforcement officials executing their duties, persons possessing legally acquired dead specimens or finished products with proof of legal acquisition, and veterinarians darting listed species for lawful purposes; (4) Species-specific exemptions override general exemptions in case of conflict; (5) Departmental officials are exempted from permit requirements when responding to strandings and entanglements; (6) Persons holding valid Marine Living Resources Act permits for specific fish species are exempted from Biodiversity Act permit requirements for those species, and are not subject to prohibitions in Column 2; (7) Prohibited activities in Marine TOPS Regulations remain valid even where general exemptions apply under this notice; (8) When species nomenclature is revised, regulations continue to apply to specimens matching the original description until the list is updated; (9) By-catch of listed species by persons holding Marine Living Resources Act permits for fishing is exempted from prohibitions provided the person complies with regulation 64; (10) Different conservation categories (Critically Endangered, Endangered, Vulnerable, Protected) warrant different levels of restriction on activities.

Obiter Dicta

While this is an administrative notice rather than a judgment, certain observations can be made: (1) The notice reflects a precautionary approach to marine conservation, with stricter prohibitions for more threatened species; (2) The framework recognizes the legitimate role of exhibition facilities (aquariums) in conservation and education; (3) The exemptions for rehabilitation and scientific research acknowledge that conservation sometimes requires intervention; (4) The recognition of by-catch exemptions reflects the practical reality that marine species interactions with fishing are inevitable, while still requiring compliance with specific by-catch regulations; (5) The detailed specification of prohibited and exempted activities provides legal certainty while creating a complex regulatory framework requiring careful interpretation; (6) The notice demonstrates integration between environmental and fisheries legislation, recognizing that Marine Living Resources Act permits serve conservation purposes; (7) The framework empowers rapid response to marine animal welfare emergencies without bureaucratic delays for permits; (8) The inclusion of entire taxonomic groups (e.g., all corals, all seahorses, all marine mammals in certain families) reflects ecosystem-based conservation approaches.

Legal Significance

This notice is significant in South African environmental law as it represents a comprehensive exercise of ministerial power to protect marine biodiversity under the National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act. It establishes a detailed regulatory framework for the conservation of threatened and protected marine species in South African waters. The notice is important because: (1) It implements South Africa's constitutional environmental right (section 24) through detailed species-specific conservation measures; (2) It balances strict conservation measures with practical exemptions for scientific research, rehabilitation, and sustainable use; (3) It integrates with other marine legislation, particularly the Marine Living Resources Act, creating a coordinated regulatory framework; (4) It addresses the full spectrum of marine biodiversity from invertebrates to marine mammals; (5) It recognizes international conservation classifications while adapting them to South African circumstances; (6) It provides legal certainty for researchers, aquariums, rehabilitation facilities, fishers, and the public regarding permitted and prohibited activities with marine species; (7) It empowers departmental officials to respond effectively to marine animal emergencies including strandings and entanglements; (8) It contributes to South Africa's international obligations under conventions such as CITES, CMS, and regional fisheries management organizations.

Cited By 1 Cases

  • Astral Operations Ltd t/a Country Fair Foods and Others v The Minister for Local Government, Environmental Affairs and Development Planning (Western Cape) and Others(1104/2020) [2022] ZASCA 62 (29 April 2022)
    Distinguishes

    Distinguished because it dealt with an appeal under section 43 of NEMA and involved obiter reasoning that did not apply to the present case where the MEC had…

Practice This Case

Sign up to practise IRAC analysis, issue spotting, and argument building on this case.

Explore More Cases

More Environmental Law cases

  • Abbott v Overstrand Municipality(99/2015) [2016] ZASCA 68
  • Abigail Nyarota v Mutare Board and Paper Mills Limited and OthersJudgment No. SC 16/25, Civil Appeal No. SC 473/24
  • ACWA Power Khanyisa Thermal Power Station (RF) Pty Ltd - Water Use Licence ApplicationLicence No: 06/B11F/CEGHI/6684, File No: 27/2/1/B611/2/1
  • Adriaan Albertus Stoltz v The Minister: South African Police N.O and OthersCase No.: M320/15 (North West Division, Mahikeng)
  • Advocate Prakash Mani Sharma and Others v. Godavari Marble Industries Pvt. Ltd. and OthersWrit No. 068-WO-0082 (Supreme Court of Nepal, Full Bench, decided on April 16, 2015 / Baisakh 3, 2072)
  • African Centre for Biodiversity NPC v Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries and Others(934/2023) [2024] ZASCA 143 (22 October 2024)
  • African Climate Alliance and Others v The Minister of Mineral Resources and Energy and OthersCase No. 56907/2021, [2024] ZAGPPHC (4 December 2024)
  • Antech Laboratories (Pvt) Ltd v Permanent Secretary for Mines & Mining Development and OthersHB 19/20, HC 2790/18

More South Africa cases

  • 3M South Africa (Pty) Ltd v The Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service(272/09) [2010] ZASCA 20 (23 March 2010)
  • 4 Seasons Logistics CC v Kgotse(1215/2023) [2026] ZASCA 09 (04 February 2026)
  • 4 Seasons Logistics CC v Nicholas Ngwanammoto Kgotse(1215/2023) [2026] ZASCA 09 (4 February 2026)
  • 4-Tune Investments (Pty) Ltd v Kingsgate Body CorporateCSOS 4565/WC/22 (Adjudication Order, 29 November 2023)
  • 68 Wolmarans Street Johannesburg (Pty) Ltd and Others v Tufh Limited(1263/2022) [2024] ZASCA 48 (15 April 2024)
  • 9 on Rydal Vale Court Body Corporate v Pan African Holdings Pty LtdCSOS-4563/KZN/23 (Adjudication Order, 8 November 2023)
  • AAA Investments (Proprietary) Limited v The Micro Finance Regulatory Council and Another
2006 (11) BCLR 1255 (CC) (also reported as CCT 51/05)
  • A A Alloy Foundry (Pty) Limited v Titaco Projects (Pty) LimitedCase No. 309/97