CaseNotes LogoCaseNotes
  • Home
  • Library
  • Research
  • Discussion Hub
  • Wiki
  • Latin Dictionary
  • Question Bank
  • Settings
S

Student

Student Account

South African Law • Jurisdictional Corpus
HomeLibraryResearchQuestionsSettings
Judicial Precedent
Ask AI

Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries v National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Citation(CCT 186/16) [2016] ZACC 26
JurisdictionZA

Facts of the Case

Data not available for this record

Legal Issues

Data not available for this record

Judicial Outcome

Data not available for this record

Ratio Decidendi

Data not available for this record

Obiter Dicta

Data not available for this record

Legal Significance

Data not available for this record

Free account

Get the most out of this judgment

Create a free CaseNotes account to save this case, see how it's cited, get an AI summary, and search 10,000+ SA judgments.

Create free accountor sign in

Case relationship graph

Case Network

Explore 4 related cases • Click to navigate

Current Case
Related Case

Cases Cited in This Judgment

  • AB and Another v Minister of Social Development[2016] ZACC 43
    Applies

    The Court applies the principle that the explanation for failure to correct the constitutional defect must be set out fully, candidly, timeously, and in…

  • Acting Speaker of the National Assembly v Teddy Bear Clinic for Abused Children and Another[2015] ZACC 16
    Applies

    The Court applies the principle that a just and equitable remedy includes suspending a declaration of invalidity to allow Parliament an opportunity to cure…

  • Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries v National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals(CCT 122/15) [2015] ZACC 27
    Related To

    The second extension application granted by this Court, extending the suspension of the order of invalidity until 27 August 2016; the respondent did not oppose…

  • National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals v Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries(CCT 120/12) [2013] ZACC 26
    Related To

    The Court confirmed the declaration of invalidity of sections 2 and 3 of the Performing Animals Protection Act and suspended the order of invalidity for 18…

  • Nohour and Another v Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development(1136/2018) [2020] ZASCA 27 (26 March 2020)
    Cites

    The Court cites the principle that the state is under a constitutional obligation to pass legislation within specific time frames and that extensions of orders…

  • Total South Africa (Pty) Ltd v MeyerCase No: JA03/2020
    Cites

    The Court cites the common law principle that once a court has pronounced a final judgment or order it becomes functus officio, and that the discretionary…

  • Xolisile Zondi v Member of the Executive Council for Traditional and Local Government Affairs and Others(CCT 73/03) [2004] ZACC 19
    Applies

    The Court applies the principle that this Court has the power and obligation under its just and equitable jurisdiction to vary the period of suspension and…

Practice This Case

Sign up to practise IRAC analysis, issue spotting, and argument building on this case.

Explore More Cases

More South Africa cases

  • 3M South Africa (Pty) Ltd v The Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service(272/09) [2010] ZASCA 20 (23 March 2010)
  • 4 Seasons Logistics CC v Kgotse(1215/2023) [2026] ZASCA 09 (04 February 2026)
  • 4 Seasons Logistics CC v Nicholas Ngwanammoto Kgotse(1215/2023) [2026] ZASCA 09 (4 February 2026)
  • 4-Tune Investments (Pty) Ltd v Kingsgate Body CorporateCSOS 4565/WC/22 (Adjudication Order, 29 November 2023)
  • 68 Wolmarans Street Johannesburg (Pty) Ltd and Others v Tufh Limited(1263/2022) [2024] ZASCA 48 (15 April 2024)
  • 9 on Rydal Vale Court Body Corporate v Pan African Holdings Pty LtdCSOS-4563/KZN/23 (Adjudication Order, 8 November 2023)
  • AAA Investments (Proprietary) Limited v The Micro Finance Regulatory Council and Another2006 (11) BCLR 1255 (CC) (also reported as CCT 51/05)
  • A A Alloy Foundry (Pty) Limited v Titaco Projects (Pty) LimitedCase No. 309/97