CaseNotes LogoCaseNotes
  • Home
  • Library
  • Research
  • Discussion Hub
  • Wiki
  • Latin Dictionary
  • Question Bank
  • Settings
S

Student

Student Account

South African Law • Jurisdictional Corpus
HomeLibraryResearchQuestionsSettings
Judicial Precedent
Ask AI

Global Environmental Trust & Mfolozi Community Environmental Justice Organisation & Others v Tendele Coal Mining (Pty) Ltd and Others (9 February 2021)

JurisdictionZA

Facts of the Case

Data not available for this record

Legal Issues

Data not available for this record

Judicial Outcome

Data not available for this record

Ratio Decidendi

Data not available for this record

Obiter Dicta

Data not available for this record

Legal Significance

Data not available for this record

Free account

Get the most out of this judgment

Create a free CaseNotes account to save this case, see how it's cited, get an AI summary, and search 10,000+ SA judgments.

Create free accountor sign in

Cases Cited in This Judgment

  • Diener N.O. v Minister of Justice and Correctional Services and Others[2018] ZACC 48
    Cites

    Cited in support of the principle approved in Endumeni regarding interpretation of statutory provisions.

  • Fose v Minister of Safety and SecurityCCT 14/96; 1997 (3) SA 786 (CC); 1997 (7) BCLR 851 (CC)
    Cites

    Cited for the principle that remedies should uphold, enhance and vindicate the underlying values and rights entrenched in the Constitution.

  • Fuel Retailers Association of Southern Africa v Director-General Environmental Management, Department of Agriculture, Conservation and Environment, Mpumalanga Province and Others(CCT 67/06) [2007] ZACC 13
    Applies

    Applied for the principle that the protection of the environment is vital to the enjoyment of rights in the Bill of Rights and for the principle that each…

  • Global Environmental Trust and Others v Tendele Coal Mining (Pty) Ltd and Others(1105/2019) [2021] ZASCA 13 (09 February 2021)
    Related To

    Neutral citation for the current judgment.

  • Independent Institute of Education (Pty) Limited v Kwazulu-Natal Law Society and Others[2019] ZACC 47
    Cites

    Cited for the principle that courts are required to interpret statutes purposively, in conformity with the Constitution.

  • Maccsand (Pty) Ltd v City of Cape Town(CCT 103/11) [2012] ZACC 7
    Follows

    Followed for the principle that both the MPRDA and NEMA give effect to s 24 of the Constitution; the MPRDA cannot override other laws; and that a mining right…

  • Maledu and Others v Itereleng Bakgatla Mineral Resources (Pty) Limited and Another[2018] ZACC 41
    Cites

    Cited for the principle that the MPRDA is not to be read to override the applicability or requirements of other statutes that may impact upon mining activity.

  • Mining and Environmental Justice Community Network of South Africa and Others v Minister of Environmental Affairs and OthersCase No: 50779/2017 (Gauteng Division, Pretoria)
    Follows

    Followed for the principle that in order to conduct mining, a party must obtain a mining right and approval of an EMP under the MPRDA as well as environmental…

  • Minister of Mineral Resources v Stern and Others; Treasure the Karoo Action Group and Another v Department of Mineral Resources and Others(1369/2017) [2019] ZASCA 99
    Cites

    Cited for the explanation of the One Environmental System expressly recognised in s 50A(2) of NEMA.

  • Natal Joint Municipal Pension Fund v Endumeni Municipality(920/2010) [2012] ZASCA 13 (15 March 2012)
    Applies

    Applied for the principle that interpretation must have regard to the language, context and purposes of the relevant statutory provisions.

  • National Council of Societies for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals v Openshaw(462/07) [2008] ZASCA 78 (30 May 2008)
    Applies

    Applied for the principle that an interdict is concerned with present or future infringements and that there must be a reasonable apprehension that a wrongful…

  • National Director of Public Prosecutions v Zuma(573/08) [2009] ZASCA 1 (12 January 2009)
    Applies

    Applied for the principle that motion proceedings are designed to resolve legal issues based on common cause facts and the Plascon-Evans rule on disputes of…

  • Public Protector v South African Reserve Bank[2019] ZACC 29
    Cites

    Cited for the principle that an appellate court will not lightly interfere with the exercise of a discretion unless it was not exercised judicially.

  • Telkom SA SOC Limited v City of Cape Town and Another[2020] ZACC 15
    Cites

    Cited for the principle that overlapping powers in different spheres of government is permissible and that one sphere's refusal does not veto the decision of…

  • Wightman v Headfour (Pty) Ltd(66/2007) [2008] ZASCA 6 (10 March 2008)
    Applies

    Applied for the principle that where a disputing party must necessarily possess knowledge of facts averred and provides only a bare denial, the court will take…

Practice This Case

Sign up to practise IRAC analysis, issue spotting, and argument building on this case.

Explore More Cases

More South Africa cases

  • 3M South Africa (Pty) Ltd v The Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service(272/09) [2010] ZASCA 20 (23 March 2010)
  • 4 Seasons Logistics CC v Kgotse(1215/2023) [2026] ZASCA 09 (04 February 2026)
  • 4 Seasons Logistics CC v Nicholas Ngwanammoto Kgotse(1215/2023) [2026] ZASCA 09 (4 February 2026)
  • 4-Tune Investments (Pty) Ltd v Kingsgate Body CorporateCSOS 4565/WC/22 (Adjudication Order, 29 November 2023)
  • 68 Wolmarans Street Johannesburg (Pty) Ltd and Others v Tufh Limited(1263/2022) [2024] ZASCA 48 (15 April 2024)
  • 9 on Rydal Vale Court Body Corporate v Pan African Holdings Pty LtdCSOS-4563/KZN/23 (Adjudication Order, 8 November 2023)
  • AAA Investments (Proprietary) Limited v The Micro Finance Regulatory Council and Another2006 (11) BCLR 1255 (CC) (also reported as CCT 51/05)
  • A A Alloy Foundry (Pty) Limited v Titaco Projects (Pty) LimitedCase No. 309/97