CaseNotes LogoCaseNotes
  • Home
  • Library
  • Research
  • Discussion Hub
  • Wiki
  • Latin Dictionary
  • Question Bank
  • Settings
S

Student

Student Account

South African Law • Jurisdictional Corpus
HomeLibraryResearchQuestionsSettings
Judicial Precedent
Ask AI

General Law Fourth Amendment Act, 1993

CitationAct No. 132 of 1993
JurisdictionZA
Area of Law
Statutory LawFamily LawMatrimonial Property LawGender Equality LawCitizenship LawAdministrative Law

Facts of the Case

The text provided is not a court judgment but a published Act of Parliament in the Government Gazette. The General Law Fourth Amendment Act, 1993 was enacted to repeal or amend numerous statutory provisions that differentiated between men and women. It amended a wide range of legislation, including the Deeds Registries Act, Magistrates' Courts Act, South African Citizenship Act, Matrimonial Property Act, Companies Act, Identification Act, Aliens Control Act and others. Its central reform was the removal or reduction of gender-based distinctions in South African legislation, most notably by abolishing the common-law marital power of a husband over the person and property of his wife in section 11 of the Matrimonial Property Act, 1984, as substituted by the Act.

Legal Issues

  • No judicial legal issues can be identified because the text is legislation, not a litigated case or judgment.
  • The enactment addresses legislative reform issues concerning the repeal of statutory provisions differentiating between men and women.
  • A central legal reform issue addressed by the Act is the abolition of marital power and the substitution of gender-neutral language such as 'spouse' for 'wife' or 'husband' in multiple statutes.

Judicial Outcome

The General Law Fourth Amendment Act, 1993 was enacted and published. It repealed or amended numerous legislative provisions that differentiated between men and women, including abolishing marital power in section 11 of the Matrimonial Property Act, 1984, subject to the stated savings and transitional provisions.

Ratio Decidendi

Not applicable. There is no ratio decidendi because this is not a court decision. The closest equivalent legislative principle is that statutory provisions differentiating between men and women were being repealed or amended, and that marital power over the person and property of a wife was abolished by statute.

Obiter Dicta

Not applicable. There are no obiter dicta because the text is not a judgment and contains no judicial observations.

Legal Significance

The Act is significant in South African legal history because it forms part of the statutory reform process that dismantled formal gender discrimination in private and public law before the constitutional era fully developed. Its most important contribution was the abolition of the common-law marital power, a major step toward legal capacity and equality for married women. It also introduced gender-neutral terminology across many statutes and removed numerous explicit legal disabilities based on sex or marital status.

Free account

Get the most out of this judgment

Create a free CaseNotes account to save this case, see how it's cited, get an AI summary, and search 10,000+ SA judgments.

Create free accountor sign in

Practice This Case

Sign up to practise IRAC analysis, issue spotting, and argument building on this case.