CaseNotes LogoCaseNotes
  • Home
  • Library
  • Research
  • Discussion Hub
  • Wiki
  • Latin Dictionary
  • Question Bank
  • Settings
S

Student

Student Account

South African Law • Jurisdictional Corpus
HomeLibraryResearchQuestionsSettings
Judicial Precedent
Ask AI

General Law Fourth Amendment Act, 1993

CitationAct No. 132 of 1993
JurisdictionZA
Area of Law
Statutory LawFamily Law
Free account

Get the most out of this judgment

Create a free CaseNotes account to save this case, see how it's cited, get an AI summary, and search 10,000+ SA judgments.

Create free accountor sign in
Matrimonial Property Law
Gender Equality Law
Citizenship Law
Administrative Law

Facts of the Case

The text provided is not a court judgment but a published Act of Parliament in the Government Gazette. The General Law Fourth Amendment Act, 1993 was enacted to repeal or amend numerous statutory provisions that differentiated between men and women. It amended a wide range of legislation, including the Deeds Registries Act, Magistrates' Courts Act, South African Citizenship Act, Matrimonial Property Act, Companies Act, Identification Act, Aliens Control Act and others. Its central reform was the removal or reduction of gender-based distinctions in South African legislation, most notably by abolishing the common-law marital power of a husband over the person and property of his wife in section 11 of the Matrimonial Property Act, 1984, as substituted by the Act.

Legal Issues

  • No judicial legal issues can be identified because the text is legislation, not a litigated case or judgment.
  • The enactment addresses legislative reform issues concerning the repeal of statutory provisions differentiating between men and women.
  • A central legal reform issue addressed by the Act is the abolition of marital power and the substitution of gender-neutral language such as 'spouse' for 'wife' or 'husband' in multiple statutes.

Judicial Outcome

The General Law Fourth Amendment Act, 1993 was enacted and published. It repealed or amended numerous legislative provisions that differentiated between men and women, including abolishing marital power in section 11 of the Matrimonial Property Act, 1984, subject to the stated savings and transitional provisions.

Ratio Decidendi

Not applicable. There is no ratio decidendi because this is not a court decision. The closest equivalent legislative principle is that statutory provisions differentiating between men and women were being repealed or amended, and that marital power over the person and property of a wife was abolished by statute.

Obiter Dicta

Not applicable. There are no obiter dicta because the text is not a judgment and contains no judicial observations.

Legal Significance

The Act is significant in South African legal history because it forms part of the statutory reform process that dismantled formal gender discrimination in private and public law before the constitutional era fully developed. Its most important contribution was the abolition of the common-law marital power, a major step toward legal capacity and equality for married women. It also introduced gender-neutral terminology across many statutes and removed numerous explicit legal disabilities based on sex or marital status.

Practice This Case

Sign up to practise IRAC analysis, issue spotting, and argument building on this case.

Explore More Cases

More Statutory Law cases

  • Division of Revenue Amendment Act, 2025Act No. 12 of 2025 (GG No. 54104, 11 February 2026)
  • Global Minimum Tax Act, 2024Act No. 46 of 2024 (GG 51830, 24 December 2024)
  • Global Minimum Tax Act, 2024Act No. 46 of 2024; Government Gazette No. 51830 (24 December 2024)
  • Gold and Foreign Exchange Contingency Reserve Account Defrayal Amendment Act, 2024Act No. 27 of 2024
  • Hendrik Johannes Pitzer v Eskom(336/11) [2012] ZASCA 44 (29 March 2012)
  • Independent Police Investigative Directorate Amendment Act, 2024Act No. 15 of 2024 (GG 50990, 30 July 2024)
  • National Council on Gender-Based Violence and Femicide Act, 2024Act No. 09 of 2024 (Government Gazette No. 50712, 27 May 2024)
  • National Nuclear Regulator Amendment Act, 2024Act No. 26 of 2024; Government Gazette No. 51804 (20 December 2024)

More South Africa cases

  • 3M South Africa (Pty) Ltd v The Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service(272/09) [2010] ZASCA 20 (23 March 2010)
  • 4 Seasons Logistics CC v Kgotse(1215/2023) [2026] ZASCA 09 (04 February 2026)
  • 4 Seasons Logistics CC v Nicholas Ngwanammoto Kgotse(1215/2023) [2026] ZASCA 09 (4 February 2026)
  • 4-Tune Investments (Pty) Ltd v Kingsgate Body CorporateCSOS 4565/WC/22 (Adjudication Order, 29 November 2023)
  • 68 Wolmarans Street Johannesburg (Pty) Ltd and Others v Tufh Limited(1263/2022) [2024] ZASCA 48 (15 April 2024)
  • 9 on Rydal Vale Court Body Corporate v Pan African Holdings Pty LtdCSOS-4563/KZN/23 (Adjudication Order, 8 November 2023)
  • AAA Investments (Proprietary) Limited v The Micro Finance Regulatory Council and Another
2006 (11) BCLR 1255 (CC) (also reported as CCT 51/05)
  • A A Alloy Foundry (Pty) Limited v Titaco Projects (Pty) LimitedCase No. 309/97