CaseNotes LogoCaseNotes
  • Home
  • Library
  • Research
  • Discussion Hub
  • Wiki
  • Latin Dictionary
  • Question Bank
  • Settings
S

Student

Student Account

South African Law • Jurisdictional Corpus
HomeLibraryResearchQuestionsSettings
Judicial Precedent
Ask AI

Expropriation Act, 2024

CitationAct No. 13 of 2024, Government Gazette No. 51964 (24 January 2025)
JurisdictionZA
Area of Law
Constitutional LawAdministrative Law
Free account

Get the most out of this judgment

Create a free CaseNotes account to save this case, see how it's cited, get an AI summary, and search 10,000+ SA judgments.

Create free accountor sign in
Property Law
Land Reform
Expropriation Law

Facts of the Case

The text provided is not a court judgment but the published text of South Africa's Expropriation Act, 2024, assented to by the President on 20 December 2024 and published in Government Gazette No. 51964 on 24 January 2025. The Act repeals the Expropriation Act 63 of 1975 and establishes a new statutory framework for the expropriation of property for a public purpose or in the public interest. It regulates investigations, notices of intention to expropriate, notices of expropriation, vesting and possession, compensation, mediation and court determination, urgent temporary use, withdrawal of expropriation, and related procedural matters. The Act expressly aligns itself with section 25 of the Constitution and identifies circumstances in which nil compensation may be just and equitable.

Legal Issues

  • Because this is legislation rather than a judgment, there were no litigated issues decided by a court.
  • The Act itself addresses the legal framework for when property may be expropriated for a public purpose or in the public interest.
  • It addresses how just and equitable compensation must be determined under section 25(3) of the Constitution.
  • It addresses when nil compensation may be just and equitable in respect of land expropriated in the public interest.
  • It addresses procedural fairness requirements, including notice, consultation, objections, mediation, court oversight, and urgent expropriation.

Judicial Outcome

No court order was made because this is not a court case. The legal effect of the text is that the Expropriation Act, 2024 was enacted, the Expropriation Act 63 of 1975 was repealed, and the new Act will come into operation on a date or dates determined by the President by proclamation in the Gazette.

Ratio Decidendi

Not available. There is no ratio decidendi because the text is not a court judgment and therefore establishes no judicially binding precedent. The binding force arises from the statute itself, not from judicial reasoning.

Obiter Dicta

Not available. There is no obiter dicta because the supplied text is legislation, not a judgment containing judicial observations.

Legal Significance

The Act is significant because it modernises South African expropriation law to align expressly with section 25 of the Constitution, replaces the 1975 Act, codifies procedural fairness protections, and expressly recognises that nil compensation may in certain circumstances be just and equitable. It is important in South African jurisprudence because it provides the legislative framework through which constitutional property rights, land reform, public interest expropriation, compensation disputes, and court supervision will be operationalised.

Practice This Case

Sign up to practise IRAC analysis, issue spotting, and argument building on this case.

Explore More Cases

More Constitutional Law cases

  • (1) Petros Makaza (2) Golden Nhika v The State and (1) Khumbuzo Gumbo (2) Sydney Ndachengedzwa v The StateCCZ 16/17 (Const. Application No. CCZ 5/13 and Const. Application No. CCZ 102/13)
  • (1) Tungamirai Madzokere (2) Lazarus Maengahama (3) Stanford Maengahama (4) Phineous Nhatarikwa (5) Stanford Mangwiro (6) Yvonne Musarurwa (7) Rebecca Mafukeni v The StateSC 8/12; Civil Application No. 318/11
  • 68 Wolmarans Street Johannesburg (Pty) Ltd and Others v Tufh Limited(1263/2022) [2024] ZASCA 48 (15 April 2024)
  • AAA Investments (Proprietary) Limited v The Micro Finance Regulatory Council and Another2006 (11) BCLR 1255 (CC) (also reported as CCT 51/05)
  • Aaron Musiteyi v The StateHMT 2-21, B 09/21
  • Abahlali baseMjondolo Movement SA and Another v Premier of the Province of KwaZulu-Natal and Others(CCT 12/09) [2009] ZACC 31
  • AB and Another v Minister of Social Development[2016] ZACC 43
  • AB and Another v Pridwin Preparatory School and Others[2020] ZACC 12

More South Africa cases

  • 3M South Africa (Pty) Ltd v The Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service(272/09) [2010] ZASCA 20 (23 March 2010)
  • 4 Seasons Logistics CC v Kgotse(1215/2023) [2026] ZASCA 09 (04 February 2026)
  • 4 Seasons Logistics CC v Nicholas Ngwanammoto Kgotse(1215/2023) [2026] ZASCA 09 (4 February 2026)
  • 4-Tune Investments (Pty) Ltd v Kingsgate Body CorporateCSOS 4565/WC/22 (Adjudication Order, 29 November 2023)
  • 68 Wolmarans Street Johannesburg (Pty) Ltd and Others v Tufh Limited(1263/2022) [2024] ZASCA 48 (15 April 2024)
  • 9 on Rydal Vale Court Body Corporate v Pan African Holdings Pty LtdCSOS-4563/KZN/23 (Adjudication Order, 8 November 2023)
  • AAA Investments (Proprietary) Limited v The Micro Finance Regulatory Council and Another
2006 (11) BCLR 1255 (CC) (also reported as CCT 51/05)
  • A A Alloy Foundry (Pty) Limited v Titaco Projects (Pty) LimitedCase No. 309/97