CaseNotes LogoCaseNotes
  • Home
  • Library
  • Research
  • Discussion Hub
  • Wiki
  • Latin Dictionary
  • Question Bank
  • Settings
S

Student

Student Account

South African Law • Jurisdictional Corpus
HomeLibraryResearchQuestionsSettings
Judicial Precedent
Ask AI

Expropriation Act, 2024

CitationAct No. 13 of 2024; Government Gazette No. 51964, 24 January 2025
JurisdictionZA
Area of Law
Constitutional LawAdministrative Law
Free account

Get the most out of this judgment

Create a free CaseNotes account to save this case, see how it's cited, get an AI summary, and search 10,000+ SA judgments.

Create free accountor sign in
Property Law
Land Reform Law
Expropriation Law

Facts of the Case

The text provided is not a court judgment but a Government Gazette publishing the Expropriation Act, 2024, after presidential assent on 20 December 2024. The Act regulates expropriation of property for a public purpose or in the public interest, repeals the Expropriation Act 63 of 1975, and creates a comprehensive statutory framework governing investigation, notice procedures, compensation, mediation, court determination, urgent temporary use, withdrawal of expropriation, and related administrative matters. The Act is expressly framed to give effect to section 25 of the Constitution, read with sections 33 and 34, and includes provisions identifying circumstances in which nil compensation for land expropriated in the public interest may be just and equitable.

Legal Issues

  • No judicial legal issues can be extracted because the text is legislation, not a judgment.
  • From the statute itself, the principal regulatory questions addressed include when property may be expropriated for a public purpose or in the public interest.
  • How just and equitable compensation is to be determined under section 25(3) of the Constitution.
  • In what limited instances nil compensation for land may be just and equitable.
  • What procedures must be followed before and after expropriation, including notice, consultation, investigation, and court oversight.
  • How disputes about compensation, procedure, and urgent temporary use are to be resolved.

Judicial Outcome

No court order was made because this is not a case. The legal outcome reflected in the text is that the President assented to the Expropriation Act, 2024, which was published for general information in Government Gazette No. 51964 on 24 January 2025. The Act repeals the Expropriation Act, 1975, but comes into operation only on a date or dates to be determined by the President by proclamation in the Gazette.

Ratio Decidendi

Not available because there is no ratio decidendi in legislation and no judicial determination in the supplied text. The closest equivalent is the statute's operative legal framework: property may be expropriated only under law of general application, for a public purpose or in the public interest, subject to just and equitable compensation determined with reference to all relevant circumstances under section 25(3) of the Constitution; and in certain defined cases involving land expropriated in the public interest, nil compensation may be just and equitable.

Obiter Dicta

Not available because the supplied text is not a judgment and therefore contains no judicial obiter dicta.

Legal Significance

The Act is highly significant in South African law because it modernises and constitutionally aligns the law of expropriation with section 25 of the Constitution. It replaces the 1975 apartheid-era expropriation statute, expressly integrates constitutional requirements of lawfulness, procedural fairness, and court oversight, and provides a national framework for expropriation for public purposes and in the public interest, including land reform. Its express recognition that nil compensation may in some cases be just and equitable is especially important in the broader jurisprudential and political debate on land reform and property rights in South Africa.

Practice This Case

Sign up to practise IRAC analysis, issue spotting, and argument building on this case.

Explore More Cases

More Constitutional Law cases

  • (1) Petros Makaza (2) Golden Nhika v The State and (1) Khumbuzo Gumbo (2) Sydney Ndachengedzwa v The StateCCZ 16/17 (Const. Application No. CCZ 5/13 and Const. Application No. CCZ 102/13)
  • (1) Tungamirai Madzokere (2) Lazarus Maengahama (3) Stanford Maengahama (4) Phineous Nhatarikwa (5) Stanford Mangwiro (6) Yvonne Musarurwa (7) Rebecca Mafukeni v The StateSC 8/12; Civil Application No. 318/11
  • 68 Wolmarans Street Johannesburg (Pty) Ltd and Others v Tufh Limited(1263/2022) [2024] ZASCA 48 (15 April 2024)
  • AAA Investments (Proprietary) Limited v The Micro Finance Regulatory Council and Another2006 (11) BCLR 1255 (CC) (also reported as CCT 51/05)
  • Aaron Musiteyi v The StateHMT 2-21, B 09/21
  • Abahlali baseMjondolo Movement SA and Another v Premier of the Province of KwaZulu-Natal and Others(CCT 12/09) [2009] ZACC 31
  • AB and Another v Minister of Social Development[2016] ZACC 43
  • AB and Another v Pridwin Preparatory School and Others[2020] ZACC 12

More South Africa cases

  • 3M South Africa (Pty) Ltd v The Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service(272/09) [2010] ZASCA 20 (23 March 2010)
  • 4 Seasons Logistics CC v Kgotse(1215/2023) [2026] ZASCA 09 (04 February 2026)
  • 4 Seasons Logistics CC v Nicholas Ngwanammoto Kgotse(1215/2023) [2026] ZASCA 09 (4 February 2026)
  • 4-Tune Investments (Pty) Ltd v Kingsgate Body CorporateCSOS 4565/WC/22 (Adjudication Order, 29 November 2023)
  • 68 Wolmarans Street Johannesburg (Pty) Ltd and Others v Tufh Limited(1263/2022) [2024] ZASCA 48 (15 April 2024)
  • 9 on Rydal Vale Court Body Corporate v Pan African Holdings Pty LtdCSOS-4563/KZN/23 (Adjudication Order, 8 November 2023)
  • AAA Investments (Proprietary) Limited v The Micro Finance Regulatory Council and Another
2006 (11) BCLR 1255 (CC) (also reported as CCT 51/05)
  • A A Alloy Foundry (Pty) Limited v Titaco Projects (Pty) LimitedCase No. 309/97