CaseNotes LogoCaseNotes
  • Home
  • Library
  • Research
  • Discussion Hub
  • Wiki
  • Latin Dictionary
  • Question Bank
  • Settings
S

Student

Student Account

South African Law • Jurisdictional Corpus
HomeLibraryResearchQuestionsSettings
Judicial Precedent
Ask AI

Divorce Amendment Act, 2024

CitationAct No. 1 of 2024; Government Gazette No. 50651, 14 May 2024
JurisdictionZA
Area of Law
Family LawMarriage and Divorce Law
Free account

Get the most out of this judgment

Create a free CaseNotes account to save this case, see how it's cited, get an AI summary, and search 10,000+ SA judgments.

Create free accountor sign in
Muslim Personal Law
Children's Law
Patrimonial Consequences of Marriage

Facts of the Case

The text provided is not a court judgment but a South African statute published in the Government Gazette. The President assented on 6 May 2024 to the Divorce Amendment Act, 2024, which amends the Divorce Act 70 of 1979. The amendments insert a definition of 'Muslim marriage' and extend the Divorce Act's divorce, child welfare, redistribution of assets, and forfeiture provisions to Muslim marriages. The Act also provides that it applies to all subsisting Muslim marriages, including marriages dissolved according to Islamic tenets where divorce proceedings under the Divorce Act had already been instituted but not finalised, and marriages subsisting as at 15 December 2014.

Legal Issues

  • No judicial legal issues can be extracted because the provided text is legislation, not a court judgment.
  • The legislative subject matter concerns whether and how the Divorce Act 70 of 1979 should be amended to recognise Muslim marriages for purposes of divorce, child welfare, redistribution of assets, and forfeiture of patrimonial benefits.

Judicial Outcome

No court order was made. The legislative outcome is that the Divorce Amendment Act, 2024 came into operation as an enacted statute, amending the Divorce Act 70 of 1979 to include Muslim marriages and related consequences.

Ratio Decidendi

Not applicable. There is no ratio decidendi because the text is not a court judgment and contains no binding judicial reasoning.

Obiter Dicta

Not applicable. There is no obiter dicta because the text is legislation rather than a judicial opinion.

Legal Significance

The Act is significant because it legislatively incorporates Muslim marriages into key parts of South African divorce law, especially concerning dissolution, protection of minor and dependent children, redistribution of assets, and forfeiture of patrimonial benefits. It helps address long-standing inequalities and legal uncertainty affecting parties to Muslim marriages within the South African family-law framework.

Practice This Case

Sign up to practise IRAC analysis, issue spotting, and argument building on this case.

Explore More Cases

More Family Law cases

  • Abigail Alfeto v Herbert ChapagutaHH 438-22, HC 11544/18
  • Abigail Chibadura (Nee Mubariki) v David Tongesai ChibaduraHH 264-16, HC 9486/14
  • Abigail Chimanga (Nee Mazvimbakupa) v Delight ChimangaHH16-26, HCH 7814/22
  • Abigail Makono (Nee Billie) v Charles Nyengera Makono and OthersHH 638-25, HCH 2271/25 (Ref HCH 2634/21)
  • Ad Hoc Central Authority for the Republic of South Africa and Another v DM[2024] ZAWCHC 170
  • Agnes Maringa v Wilson Mukandatsama and Director of Housing (City of Gweru)HB 28/19, HC 1424/18
  • Agnes Paradza v Brighton Paradza and OthersHH 214-2011, HC 9439/11
  • Ahmed Raffik Omar v The Government of the Republic of South Africa and Others

More South Africa cases

  • 3M South Africa (Pty) Ltd v The Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service(272/09) [2010] ZASCA 20 (23 March 2010)
  • 4 Seasons Logistics CC v Kgotse(1215/2023) [2026] ZASCA 09 (04 February 2026)
  • 4 Seasons Logistics CC v Nicholas Ngwanammoto Kgotse(1215/2023) [2026] ZASCA 09 (4 February 2026)
  • 4-Tune Investments (Pty) Ltd v Kingsgate Body CorporateCSOS 4565/WC/22 (Adjudication Order, 29 November 2023)
  • 68 Wolmarans Street Johannesburg (Pty) Ltd and Others v Tufh Limited(1263/2022) [2024] ZASCA 48 (15 April 2024)
  • 9 on Rydal Vale Court Body Corporate v Pan African Holdings Pty LtdCSOS-4563/KZN/23 (Adjudication Order, 8 November 2023)
  • AAA Investments (Proprietary) Limited v The Micro Finance Regulatory Council and Another
2006 (11) BCLR 1255 (CC) (also reported as CCT 51/05)
  • A A Alloy Foundry (Pty) Limited v Titaco Projects (Pty) LimitedCase No. 309/97