The applicant, Balboa Park Body Corporate, is the body corporate of a sectional title scheme. The respondent, Dream Team Trading 724 CC, is the registered owner of unit 74B in the scheme. The body corporate alleged that the respondent had failed to pay monthly levies and ancillary charges, including monthly CSOS levies, despite written demands. It sought an order under section 39(1)(e) of the Community Schemes Ombud Service Act 9 of 2011 for payment of the outstanding amount. The respondent explained that illness and financial hardship had affected its ability to pay and said it had previously settled arrears in March/April 2022 by paying R16 000, after which legal fees of R4 000 were allegedly added. The adjudicator called for further information, considered the latest levy statement, and found that the complained-of legal fees were not included in the amount claimed. The applicant proved an outstanding amount of R11 162.96 as at 20 March 2024.
The application succeeded. The adjudicator granted relief under section 39(1)(e) of the CSOS Act and declared that the respondent is indebted to the applicant in the amount of R11 162.96 in respect of levies and ancillary charges for unit 74B as at 20 March 2024. The respondent was ordered to pay that amount in six equal monthly instalments of R1 860.49 commencing on 1 April 2024, with the remaining instalments payable on the first day of each succeeding month. The order did not affect the respondent's ongoing obligation to pay regular monthly levies and ancillary charges. No interest would accrue during the instalment period, the full balance would become immediately due upon default, and there was no order as to costs.
A body corporate is entitled, under the STSMA and CSOS Act, to recover outstanding levies and ancillary charges from a unit owner where those charges were properly levied and proved on the evidence. If the applicant establishes the indebtedness on a balance of probabilities and the disputed items complained of are not part of the amount claimed, relief under section 39(1)(e) of the CSOS Act should be granted. Owners in sectional title schemes remain obliged to contribute to the body corporate's funds as levied, since the body corporate depends on those contributions to fulfil its statutory functions.
The adjudicator observed that defaulting owners are effectively subsidised by other owners who pay their levies conscientiously and that a body corporate cannot perform its functions without contributions from unit owners. These remarks explain the policy context of levy enforcement but were not independently necessary to the dispositive finding. The instalment arrangement and exclusion of interest during that period were also discretionary case-management measures rather than statements of general law.
The decision is significant in community schemes and sectional title practice because it confirms the enforceability of body corporate levy claims through the CSOS adjudication process under section 39(1)(e). It reinforces that owners are obliged to pay levies and ancillary charges duly raised under the STSMA and scheme rules, and that unsupported complaints about unrelated or excluded charges will not defeat a properly proved levy claim. It also illustrates the CSOS's practical approach of granting payment orders while structuring instalments to accommodate financial hardship without undermining the body corporate's funding needs.