Sasfin (Pty) Ltd v Beukes

Sasfin and Beukes entered into a reciprocal contract. Sasfin sued Beukes for breach of contract. Beukes raised the exceptio non adimpleti contractus (the defence that the plaintiff has not performed its own obligations), arguing that Sasfin had also not performed and therefore could not claim performance from him.

Sasfin's claim was dismissed. Beukes was entitled to suspend his performance until Sasfin performed its own obligations.

This is the leading case on the exceptio non adimpleti contractus in South African contract law. It clarified when parties can suspend performance in reciprocal contracts and established the requirements for raising the defence. The case is essential for understanding remedies for breach of contract and the principle of reciprocity in contractual obligations.