The applicant, Leopards Rest Homeowners Association NPC, a homeowners' association constituting a community scheme under the Community Schemes Ombud Service Act 9 of 2011 (CSOS Act), applied for relief under section 39(1)(e) of the CSOS Act against the respondent, BP Phele, the registered owner of Unit 4438 in the scheme. The association alleged that the respondent had fallen into arrears with monthly levies and ancillary charges, including CSOS levies. The respondent did not formally oppose the application before adjudication, but an email from him to CSOS indicated that he had been making payments using an older account reference and attached proof of various payments from 2019 to 2023. The adjudicator found that although payments had been made, they were irregular and in some months less than the required monthly levy of R350. Under the HOA's Memorandum of Incorporation and conduct rules, levies were payable monthly in advance, interest could be charged on arrears, and legal/administrative recovery costs could be debited. By 21 July 2023 the amount outstanding, including interest and administration charges, was found to be R3,713.69.
The application was granted substantially in favour of the applicant. The adjudicator declared that the respondent owed the applicant R3,713.69 in respect of levies and ancillary amounts up to 21 July 2023. The respondent was ordered to pay this amount in six equal monthly instalments of R618.95, commencing within 30 days of delivery of the order, with subsequent instalments due on the first day of each succeeding month. No interest would accrue on the outstanding amount during the six-month payment period. If the respondent defaulted on any instalment, the full outstanding amount would become immediately due and payable. The applicant's request for an order compelling payment of future monthly contributions was refused. There was no order as to costs.
A registered owner in a homeowners' association is contractually bound by the association's MOI and conduct rules, including obligations to pay levies and authorised ancillary charges. Where the evidence shows irregular or insufficient payments, the association may obtain relief under section 39(1)(e) of the CSOS Act for payment of proven arrear levies, interest, and lawful administration/collection charges. However, relief under section 39 is confined to the remedies authorised by the CSOS Act, and an order for payment of unspecified future monthly contributions falls outside that statutory ambit.
The adjudicator made broader observations that levies are the 'lifeblood' of a homeowners' association and that the directors cannot effectively manage the scheme without owners' contributions. The adjudicator also commented generally on the serious financial implications for community schemes when owners default on levies. These remarks explain the practical importance of levy enforcement but were not strictly necessary to the determination of the precise arrears dispute.
The matter is significant as a CSOS adjudication confirming that homeowners' associations may use the CSOS dispute-resolution mechanism to recover arrear levies, interest, and permissible collection charges from defaulting owners. It reinforces the South African principle that an owner who purchases property in a community scheme is contractually bound by the scheme's constitutive documents and conduct rules. It also illustrates an important limit on CSOS relief under section 39: an adjudicator may grant payment orders for existing arrears but not necessarily a general prospective order for future monthly contributions where that relief falls outside the statutory ambit.