PPC Limited, a dominant cement manufacturer and supplier, had for over 12 years concluded annual rebate agreements with Temblor Trading (Pty) Ltd t/a EST Building & Hardware (EST), a cooperative buying group representing hardware retailers. EST itself did not buy cement but pooled members’ volumes to secure rebates from PPC, retaining a portion before distributing the balance to members. In November 2024, PPC decided not to renew the rebate agreement with EST for 2025, opting instead to contract directly with individual EST members and pay rebates directly to them. EST approached the Competition Tribunal urgently for interim relief under s 49C of the Competition Act, alleging that PPC’s conduct constituted a refusal to supply and exclusionary conduct by a dominant firm. The Tribunal granted interim relief interdicting PPC from refusing to deal with EST and from altering supply terms. PPC launched both a review and an appeal to the Competition Appeal Court, primarily contending that the Tribunal’s order was procedurally unfair because EST members, whose rights and interests were directly affected, were not joined or heard.