The court observed that every litigant wishes to have their matter heard urgently, but not every matter meets the requirements of urgency. Urgent applications are only appropriate where failure to act would render the eventual relief nugatory. The court noted that ZACC appeared to be attempting to impose itself on other constitutionally established bodies, and emphasized that while constitutional bodies must cooperate with each other for proper administration of justice, none should exercise an oversight role over others unless expressly authorized by law. The court commented that the application appeared to be filed merely to show ZACC's intention to impose itself on other bodies, rather than to achieve real and substantial justice. The judge also noted that magistrates, as judicial officers, are not subject to the control or direction of anyone in the discharge of their judicial functions and work independently of all independent commissions, including ZACC.