On 7 January 2014, the accused, deceased Petros Sibanda, and witness Meluleki Dube drank beer at Crystal Spirits Nite Club at Spitzkop Business Centre in Gwanda until 3am on 8 January 2014. The accused and deceased, who were tenants residing at the same house, parted ways with Dube and walked together towards their residence. The deceased was found dead the following morning near house number 2904 Spitzkop North Extension, Gwanda. The post-mortem report indicated the cause of death as asphyxia, broncho-aspiration, and head injury from assault with stones. The accused was the last person seen with the deceased alive. In his confirmed warned and cautioned statement, the accused admitted striking the deceased twice on the head with a stone, searching him, and taking R450 from his pocket. The accused claimed they had a misunderstanding while drinking and he wanted to take the deceased's money.
The accused was found guilty of murder with actual intent.
A confirmed warned and cautioned statement made under section 113 and admitted under section 256(2) of the Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act must be admitted into evidence without further proof, and the onus is on the accused to prove its inadmissibility if challenged. Where an accused gives materially inconsistent versions in his confirmed statement, defence outline, and evidence in chief, and where his conduct after the alleged crime is inexplicable and inconsistent with innocence, the court is entitled to reject the defence as fabricated. Circumstantial evidence, including being the last person seen with the deceased alive and suspicious conduct thereafter, combined with a confirmed admission, direct evidence from indications at the scene, and post-mortem findings, can establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Murder with actual intent is proven where the accused deliberately strikes the deceased on the head with a stone with the intention to kill in order to rob the victim and prevent identification.
The court took judicial notice that Gwanda is a very small town where Binna, Gwanda town, Phakama, Blanket Mine and Spitzkop form a closely knit community, making it implausible that the accused would not have heard of the deceased's death for two days. The court observed that circumstantial evidence may sometimes be less contestable and more easily relied upon than direct witness evidence, which is subject to weaknesses of observation and recollection. The court noted that showing a defendant had means, motive and opportunity may go some way towards establishing a prima facie case requiring an answer.
This case demonstrates the Zimbabwean courts' approach to murder cases based on confirmed warned and cautioned statements, circumstantial evidence, and the rejection of fabricated defences. It illustrates the application of section 256(2) of the Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act regarding the admissibility of confirmed statements, and the principle that once such a statement is properly confirmed, the onus shifts to the accused to prove inadmissibility. The case also demonstrates how courts assess credibility through consistency of versions and the reasonableness of an accused's conduct and explanations.