On 24 June 2012 at the 244 km peg along the Harare-Gweru road, the appellant was driving a FAW ZUPCO bus registration number ACF 4202 from Kwekwe towards Gweru. Mdzengi Lisias was driving a Dong Feng lorry registration number ABE 2247, which had a breakdown and was parked off the road but encroaching into the left lane with the rear right side wheels. The lorry was loaded with steel rods at the back. The appellant's bus drove onto the stationary truck and struck the iron rods, which were forced into the bus. The bus veered off the road and stopped about 108 metres from the truck. A total of 12 people died: 7 on the spot, 2 on admission at Gweru General Hospital, and 3 at Parirenyatwa Hospital. The appellant was charged with and convicted of culpable homicide and sentenced to 2 years imprisonment, with a 2-year driving prohibition and licence cancellation.
The appeal against conviction was dismissed. The appeal against sentence was allowed in part. The sentence was set aside and substituted with: 12 months imprisonment, of which 3 months imprisonment is suspended for 2 years on condition the accused does not within that period commit any offence involving culpable homicide or negligent driving of a motor vehicle for which he will be sentenced to imprisonment without the option of a fine. In addition, the accused is prohibited from driving for a period of 2 years and his driver's licence is cancelled.
Where a driver is convicted of culpable homicide arising from negligent driving (as opposed to reckless driving), the court must apply section 52 of the Road Traffic Act Chapter 13:11, not section 53. The maximum sentence for negligent driving of a commuter omnibus or heavy vehicle under section 52(2) is imprisonment for a period not exceeding one year. Any sentence exceeding this statutory maximum is unlawful and must be set aside. Under section 52(4)(c), in cases involving commuter omnibuses or heavy vehicles, a court must prohibit the convicted person from driving for a period of not less than 2 years unless special circumstances are shown. The mere contribution of another road user to the accident does not automatically constitute special circumstances sufficient to avoid the mandatory driving prohibition.
The court noted that while the truck driver's actions in parking the vehicle in a manner that encroached into the left lane contributed to the accident, this contribution did not amount to special circumstances warranting departure from the mandatory 2-year driving prohibition. The court also observed that the particulars of negligence were apparent in the circumstances of the case, with counsel for the appellant conceding this point.
This case establishes the important distinction between negligent driving under section 52 and reckless driving under section 53 of the Road Traffic Act in the context of culpable homicide convictions. It clarifies that courts must apply the correct statutory provision with its corresponding maximum penalties when sentencing for traffic-related homicides. The case emphasizes that even where multiple fatalities result from a traffic accident, the sentence must not exceed the statutory maximum prescribed for the particular offence. It also demonstrates the strict application of mandatory driving prohibitions under section 52(4)(c), requiring clear proof of special circumstances to avoid such prohibition, and that contribution by another road user to the accident does not automatically constitute special circumstances.