The applicant filed an urgent chamber application for a stay of execution on 22 May 2018. The matter was set down for 24 May 2018 but postponed to 5 June 2018 at the respondents' request to accommodate their counsel of choice. On 5 June 2018, the parties requested more time for out of court settlement discussions and the matter was postponed to 13 June 2018. On 13 June 2018, the parties advised they had reached a settlement in principle. Both parties read out their understanding of the settlement terms before the court, which included: removal of the matter from the roll, a lump sum payment by the applicant towards the outstanding judgment followed by monthly instalments, and payment of costs in the sum of $2,000 to the respondents. The parties undertook to file the written deed of settlement by 14 June 2018. However, instead of filing the settlement agreement, the applicant's legal practitioners filed a notice of renunciation of agency on 14 June 2018, based on the client's letter alleging they were deprived of access to the file and not consulted on actions taken. The matter was re-set down for 20 June 2018, where the applicant's directors (non-legal practitioners) sought time to engage new legal counsel.