The Minister of Finance (1st respondent) announced in his mid-year budget review on 1 August 2019 a 12-month suspension of the publication of year-on-year inflation figures by Zimbabwe Statistical Agency (Zimstats, 2nd respondent). The reason given was that the transition from a multi-currency regime to a mono-currency (Zimbabwe dollar) regime made it impossible to calculate annual inflation rates, as it would not be comparing "like with like" in terms of currency regimes. The 1st applicant is a trade union representing National Social Security Authority employees, and the 2nd applicant is a trust representing pensioners' interests. Both applicants challenged the suspension, arguing that annual inflation figures are critical for wage negotiations, pension calculations, and economic planning. The applicants challenged the decision on grounds of illegality, irrationality, gross unreasonableness, and violation of constitutional principles of good governance and transparency.
The application was dismissed with costs on the basis of the preliminary points regarding lack of authority of the deponents to institute proceedings on behalf of both applicants.
A registered trade union, being a body corporate under section 29 of the Labour Act, must provide a resolution authorizing a person to institute legal proceedings on its behalf, in accordance with the principle established in Madzivire v Zvarivadza. A trust, lacking legal personality, must be represented by its trustees (not administrative officials) when instituting legal proceedings, and the authority to do so must be demonstrated through appropriate documentation such as the trust deed or trustee resolution. Failure to provide such authorization renders an application fatally defective and justifies dismissal on preliminary grounds.
The court noted that the substantive issues raised by the applicants regarding the suspension of inflation statistics - including allegations of illegality, irrationality, unreasonableness and constitutional violations - were not decided due to the preliminary point succeeding. The court also observed that one exception to the requirement for board resolutions exists where a company has only one director who can perform judicial acts without holding a meeting (African Diamond Distributors case), though this exception was not applicable to the facts of this case. The court expressed that all uncertainty regarding authority could have been obviated by attaching suitable confirmation in the form of a deed of trust, resolution, or both.
This case reinforces the strict application of procedural requirements for legal standing and authority to institute proceedings in Zimbabwean law. It confirms that the principle in Madzivire v Zvarivadza (requiring corporate entities to produce resolutions authorizing legal proceedings) applies equally to trade unions registered under the Labour Act as bodies corporate. It also clarifies that trusts, lacking legal personality, must be represented by their trustees (not administrative functionaries) when instituting legal proceedings, and emphasizes the importance of attaching trust deeds and proper authorization documentation. The case demonstrates that courts will not overlook procedural irregularities regarding authority to sue, even where substantive constitutional and administrative law issues of public importance are raised.