The plaintiff alleged he purchased Stand No. 12385 Unit N, Seke, Chitungwiza from the first defendant on 27 November 2003. The first defendant purportedly sold the property in his capacity as executor dative of the Estate of the late Abbie Ngwenya. Abbie Ngwenya had allegedly bought the property from Robert Latifa, who had in turn bought it from Washington Nhamburo, the eldest son of the late Ururu Nhamburo who died in 1985. Despite the alleged sale transactions, the property remained registered in the name of late Ururu Nhamburo until 2008, when the second defendant had it registered in his own name as executor dative of the Estate of the late Ururu Nhamburo. The plaintiff occupied the property but could not have it ceded into his name due to the first defendant's failure to effect cession and the second defendant's conduct. The second defendant contended he was the rightful heir and that the plaintiff was merely his tenant paying rent. Evidence showed that the Estate of late Ururu Nhamburo was never properly registered or administered in terms of law before Washington Nhamburo allegedly sold the property.
Absolution from the instance was granted. Each party was ordered to bear their own costs of suit.
A sale of estate property is invalid where: (1) the estate has not been registered and administered in terms of the Administration of Estates Act; (2) the purported seller has not been appointed executor dative or issued with letters of administration in terms of sections 23 and 25 of the Act; and (3) the Master's consent to sell by private treaty has not been obtained as required by section 120 of the Act. Where the original disposition of estate property is a nullity due to non-compliance with these statutory requirements, all subsequent dispositions are fatally affected, and a purchaser cannot acquire valid title through the chain of defective transactions. The onus is on a person claiming title through a chain of sales to prove that each transaction in the chain complied with the legal requirements, particularly where estate property is involved.
The court made observations about the sad state of affairs in estate administration revealed by the case, noting the need for expeditious registration and administration of deceased estates in terms of law. The court also commented on the second defendant's unreliability and dishonesty in claiming to be the eldest son when he was not, describing this as a blatant lie designed to take advantage of the situation where the two actual eldest sons had died. However, the court noted that the second defendant's dishonesty did not cure the fundamental defects in the plaintiff's claim. The court also observed that informal family arrangements for distributing estate property, without proper legal authorization, cannot confer valid title.
This case is significant in Zimbabwean estate administration law as it emphasizes the strict requirement for compliance with the Administration of Estates Act in the disposal of estate property. It demonstrates that informal family arrangements regarding inheritance, without proper appointment of executors dative and letters of administration, cannot validly transfer title to estate property. The case highlights the consequences of failure to expeditiously register and administer deceased estates in terms of law, and the importance of obtaining Master's consent for private treaty sales of estate property under section 120 of the Act. It serves as a warning about the chain of title problems that arise when estate property is disposed of outside the statutory framework.