The applicant, a housing co-operative, sought to purchase 303 residential stands from the City of Harare. In 1999, the High Court ordered the respondent to sell the stands subject to section 152 of the Urban Councils Act. In September 2000, the respondent indicated a price of ZW$7.50 per square metre, but stated this was subject to completion of infrastructure projects. The respondent returned the applicant's part-payment in November 2000, stating no contract had been signed. Various pre-conditions were imposed between 2000-2009, which were eventually satisfied. By January 2013, council approved the sale, but a dispute arose over price. Zimbabwe had since changed from Zimbabwe dollars to United States dollars. The applicant initially sought to enforce the ZW$7.50 price (equivalent to US$0.14), but then conceded this was no longer tenable and offered US$1.00 per square metre. The respondent countered with US$2.00 per square metre.
The application was dismissed with costs.
The court cannot intervene to fix or determine the price for the sale of urban land by a local authority where section 152 of the Urban Councils Act applies. That statutory provision subjects all proposed sales of urban land to public advertisement and objection procedures, meaning no price is final until subjected to public scrutiny and approval. In the absence of a legal basis for judicial intervention to conclude a new price for parties, such relief cannot be granted. Even prior court orders relating to such sales remain subject to the procedural requirements of section 152.
The court observed that both parties had recognized that the original proposed price of ZW$7.50 per square metre was no longer tenable due to the change in currency from Zimbabwe dollars to United States dollars. The court noted that the correspondence between the parties demonstrated that only negotiations had taken place and no actual contract of sale had been concluded, despite the indication of a price and the passage of considerable time. The court also remarked that various pre-conditions had been imposed by the respondent between 2000 and 2009 before the sale could be concluded.
This case clarifies the limits of judicial intervention in local authority land transactions in Zimbabwe. It establishes that courts cannot fix prices for the sale of urban land by councils where such sales are governed by section 152 of the Urban Councils Act, which mandates public participation and scrutiny. The judgment reinforces the principle that statutory procedures for local government land disposal must be followed and cannot be bypassed by court order. It also demonstrates the legal consequences of currency changes on unconcluded contracts and the principle that mere price proposals during negotiations do not create binding contractual obligations.