CaseNotes LogoCaseNotes
  • Home
  • Library
  • Research
  • Discussion Hub
  • Wiki
  • Latin Dictionary
  • Question Bank
  • Settings
S

Student

Student Account

South African Law • Jurisdictional Corpus
HomeLibraryResearchQuestionsSettings
Judicial Precedent
Ask AI

Gauteng Department of Agriculture and Rural Development and Others v Interwaste (Pty) Ltd and Others

JurisdictionZA

Facts of the Case

Data not available for this record

Legal Issues

Data not available for this record

Judicial Outcome

Data not available for this record

Ratio Decidendi

Data not available for this record

Obiter Dicta

Data not available for this record

Legal Significance

Data not available for this record

Free account

Get the most out of this judgment

Create a free CaseNotes account to save this case, see how it's cited, get an AI summary, and search 10,000+ SA judgments.

Create free accountor sign in

Cases Cited in This Judgment

  • Gauteng Department of Agriculture and Rural Development & others v Interwaste (Pty) Ltd & others(458/2018) [2019] ZASCA 68 (30 May 2019)
    Cites

    The case number for the present appeal before the Supreme Court of Appeal.

  • Natal Joint Municipal Pension Fund v Endumeni Municipality(920/2010) [2012] ZASCA 13 (15 March 2012)
    Applies

    The judgment applies the interpretive principle that a document should be construed sensibly and not have an unbusinesslike result in construing the waste…

  • Pretorius v Trustees of Ponders End Body Corporate and Earth Zone PropertiesCSOS 7586/GP/22 (Adjudication Order, 03 June 2024)
    Appeal From

    The SCA (Navsa ADP, with Swain, Zondi, and Molemela JJA and Weiner AJA concurring) upheld the appeal with leave granted by the high court. The court found that…

  • Rand Water Board v Rotek Industries (Pty) LtdCase no: 199/2002 (SCA)
    Cites

    The decision is cited in support of the general principle that courts will not make determinations that have no practical effect.

  • The City of Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality v Blair Atholl Homeowners Association(106/2018) [2018] ZASCA 176 (3 December 2018)
    Cites

    The case is cited alongside Endumeni for principles of sensible interpretation of documents.

Practice This Case

Sign up to practise IRAC analysis, issue spotting, and argument building on this case.

Explore More Cases

More South Africa cases

  • 3M South Africa (Pty) Ltd v The Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service(272/09) [2010] ZASCA 20 (23 March 2010)
  • 4 Seasons Logistics CC v Kgotse(1215/2023) [2026] ZASCA 09 (04 February 2026)
  • 4 Seasons Logistics CC v Nicholas Ngwanammoto Kgotse(1215/2023) [2026] ZASCA 09 (4 February 2026)
  • 4-Tune Investments (Pty) Ltd v Kingsgate Body CorporateCSOS 4565/WC/22 (Adjudication Order, 29 November 2023)
  • 68 Wolmarans Street Johannesburg (Pty) Ltd and Others v Tufh Limited(1263/2022) [2024] ZASCA 48 (15 April 2024)
  • 9 on Rydal Vale Court Body Corporate v Pan African Holdings Pty LtdCSOS-4563/KZN/23 (Adjudication Order, 8 November 2023)
  • AAA Investments (Proprietary) Limited v The Micro Finance Regulatory Council and Another2006 (11) BCLR 1255 (CC) (also reported as CCT 51/05)
  • A A Alloy Foundry (Pty) Limited v Titaco Projects (Pty) LimitedCase No. 309/97