The respondents, a married couple, owned a residential property in Stellenbosch which had been their family home before they relocated to Australia in 2018. Unsure whether the move would be permanent, they rented out the property to the appellant under a three-year lease ending in December 2023. In August 2023, after deciding to settle permanently in Australia and to sell the property, the parties concluded a second written lease for a further three years commencing January 2024. This second lease expressly allowed the respondents to terminate on three months’ written notice. The property was sold in December 2023 with vacant possession due on 1 April 2024. The respondents gave notice terminating the lease with effect from 31 March 2024. Although the appellant initially accepted the validity of the termination, he later contended that the lease was protected by the Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008 (CPA) as a fixed-term consumer agreement, and that it could not be terminated without a material breach. The respondents approached the High Court for declaratory relief and an order that the appellant vacate. The High Court held that the CPA did not apply, upheld the termination, and ordered the appellant to vacate by 31 March 2024. The appellant appealed to the Supreme Court of Appeal.