The matter arises in ongoing land restitution proceedings concerning Rondavel 403 in the Standerton district, Mpumalanga. Prior to the hearing of evidence, the Land Claims Court conducted a two-day inspection in loco of several farms to observe physical features relevant to historic occupation. The inspection was comprehensively recorded by audio and photographs, and counsel agreed that a minute of the inspection would be prepared. A dispute subsequently arose regarding the content of the draft minute: the plaintiff (Cindi Family) objected to the inclusion of opinions, conclusions, and disputed factual assertions, as well as headings implying contested historical associations, while the landowner defendants contended that recording what was said during the inspection was necessary to give context and meaning to the observations. The court was called upon to rule on how the inspection minute should be formulated and what it may properly contain.