Tulip Diamonds FZE, a company incorporated in the United Arab Emirates with no physical presence in South Africa, acted as an intermediary in Dubai for Omega Diamonds BVBA, a Belgian company under criminal investigation in Belgium for alleged tax and customs fraud involving the concealment of the origin of diamonds. Belgian authorities issued a Letter of Request to South African authorities under the International Co-operation in Criminal Matters Act 75 of 1996, seeking evidence from Brinks Southern Africa (Pty) Ltd, a courier used in transporting diamonds, including documents relating to Tulip. The Minister for Justice approved the request, and a magistrate issued a subpoena under section 205 of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977 requiring Brinks to produce documents, including 18 invoices relating to Tulip. Tulip was not notified of the request or subpoena but learned of them and sought to interdict disclosure, then launched review proceedings to set aside the Minister’s, Director-General’s and Magistrate’s decisions on grounds of illegality, procedural unfairness and non-compliance with the Co-operation Act and PAJA. The High Court and Supreme Court of Appeal dismissed the application on the basis that Tulip lacked standing.