The judgment reinforces stringent standards for granting leave to appeal under section 17 of the Superior Courts Act within labour litigation. Substantively, it underscores the Constitutional Court’s firm rejection of collective guilt in labour law, confirming that dismissals for collective or derivative misconduct require individual identification and proof of complicity at the time the decision to dismiss is made. The case affirms the centrality of substantive and procedural fairness, including audi alteram partem, in disciplinary proceedings.