The parties, an unmarried heterosexual couple, cohabited for approximately seven years (1999–2006). After the relationship ended, the appellant sued the respondent in the Western Cape High Court claiming, firstly, that an oral joint venture agreement existed entitling him to a half-share in immovable property at Port St Francis, and alternatively that the respondent owed him maintenance, either by operation of law or in terms of a tacit contract. The appellant had limited income and assets, while the respondent was wealthy and had supported him during the relationship. The High Court rejected both claims, finding no joint venture agreement and no duty of support. The appellant appealed to the Supreme Court of Appeal.