In 2001, CIM and Foschini entered into an oral agreement whereby Foschini would market cellular phone insurance policies on behalf of CIM. Under the agreement, Foschini would assist customers in completing application forms, handle queries and claims, undertake verification and reconciliation, and manage the phone replacement procedure. In return, CIM agreed to pay Foschini an administration fee (initially R5, later increased to R10) upon receipt of each premium payment from customers. The agreement was silent as to its duration and was terminable on reasonable notice. Foschini terminated the agreement with effect from 2 April 2007. After termination, CIM stopped paying administration fees in respect of premiums received on policies that had been sold before termination. Foschini claimed approximately R6 million in unpaid administration fees and sought a monthly accounting.
The appeal was dismissed with costs, including the costs of two counsel. The order of the Western Cape High Court was upheld, requiring CIM to pay Foschini approximately R6 million in administration fees collected after termination, to provide monthly accounting to Foschini, and to pay costs.
The binding legal principle established is that termination of an agreement does not extinguish accrued rights that arose prior to termination. Where a party has performed its obligations under a contract and established an accrued right - being a right that is due and enforceable as a cause of action independent of any executory part of the contract - that right survives termination of the agreement. A term will not be implied by law where it would conflict with the express terms of the agreement and deprive a party of benefits that have accrued to it. The court will not imply a term that payment obligations cease upon termination where the express terms of the contract provide for payment upon specific events (such as receipt of premiums) without any time limitation, and where such payment is not reciprocal to ongoing executory obligations.
The court made observations about improper procedure, noting that it is not only improper to place further submissions to the court after argument, but particularly so where the other side has refused consent. The court nevertheless considered the post-hearing submission from CIM but found it did not add to the contentions already advanced. The court also noted that Foschini's particulars of claim contained no reference to termination of the oral agreement, and termination formed no part of its cause of action - nor was there any need to allege termination, as the claim was based on accrued rights arising from performance prior to termination.
This case is significant in South African contract law as it clarifies the distinction between executory obligations that terminate with an agreement and accrued rights that survive termination. It establishes that where a party has performed its obligations under a contract prior to termination, it retains the right to receive the agreed contra prestation even after the agreement ends. The judgment reinforces the principle that termination of a contract does not automatically extinguish all rights under it - particularly accrued rights that are independent of any ongoing executory obligations. The case also demonstrates the limits of implying terms by law, confirming that such terms will not be implied where they would conflict with express terms of the agreement or deprive a party of benefits already earned. It provides important guidance on the construction of commercial agreements, particularly in the insurance and retail sectors, regarding ongoing payment obligations after termination.