The applicants, including the Law Society of South Africa and several South African landowners affected by Zimbabwe’s land reform programme, challenged the conduct of the President of South Africa in relation to the Southern African Development Community (SADC) Tribunal. Zimbabwe had expropriated land without compensation and removed the jurisdiction of its domestic courts, leaving the SADC Tribunal as the only forum for affected individuals. After the Tribunal ruled against Zimbabwe, SADC Heads of State, including South Africa’s President, decided not to reappoint Tribunal members, effectively suspending its operations. The President also signed the 2014 SADC Protocol, which removed the Tribunal’s jurisdiction over disputes brought by individuals against states. The applicants argued that the President’s participation in suspending the Tribunal and signing the Protocol was unconstitutional, unlawful, and irrational, as it removed access to justice and undermined the rule of law.