James Pretorius, the registered owner of unit 61 in the Ponders End sectional title scheme, brought an application to the Community Schemes Ombud Service under section 38 of the Community Schemes Ombud Service Act 9 of 2011. He complained that legal fees had been debited to his levy account by the body corporate's managing agent, Earth Zone Properties, and sought an order under section 39(1)(c) declaring the contribution unreasonable or incorrectly determined. He asked that the legal fees be removed and that an appropriate payment plan be arranged for his arrears. The respondents stated that Pretorius had not paid levies since 2021, that the account was handed to attorneys for debt collection, and that the body corporate had a valid AGM-approved resolution authorising recovery of legal costs from defaulting owners and debiting those costs to their levy accounts. The legal fees in issue totalled R12 572.95. The respondents also indicated willingness to consider a reasonable payment plan, although none had yet been agreed.
The application was dismissed. The adjudicator refused all relief sought by the applicant, including removal of the legal fees and an order compelling a payment plan. No order as to costs was made.
A sectional title owner is liable, under PMR 25(4), for reasonable legal costs and disbursements incurred by the body corporate in collecting arrear levies, and where the scheme has validly resolved that such costs are recoverable and may be debited to the owner's levy account, the owner is bound by that resolution. Further, a CSOS adjudicator may grant only relief authorised by section 39 of the CSOS Act; relief falling outside that section, such as compelling the conclusion of a payment agreement, is beyond the adjudicator's jurisdiction.
The adjudicator observed that the respondents were willing to engage with the applicant regarding a reasonable payment arrangement and noted that, once such a plan is in place, penalty interest and legal fees would cease to accrue. This was not part of the binding order. The adjudicator also remarked generally that scheme members are reasonably expected to know resolutions taken at general or trustees' meetings.
The decision is significant in community schemes and sectional title governance because it confirms that, where supported by PMR 25(4) and a valid scheme resolution, a body corporate may recover reasonable legal costs incurred in collecting arrear levies from a defaulting owner and debit those costs to the owner's levy account. It also reinforces the jurisdictional limits of CSOS adjudicators: they may grant only remedies falling within section 39 of the CSOS Act and cannot compel parties to conclude payment agreements if such relief is not statutorily authorised.