The appellants, André and Francois Malan, were brothers and practising attorneys trading as Malan & Partners. André handled conveyancing and bookkeeping, while Francois ran a Road Accident Fund (RAF) practice. The firm engaged in large-scale touting through approximately 18 so‑called consultants who sourced RAF claims, prepared documentation, and sold files to the firm. Francois rendered little to no professional services to clients. A consultant, Wilken, was responsible for widespread fraud, including falsified RAF claims. Despite becoming aware of fraud in 2001, Francois delayed reporting it to the RAF and failed to inform the Law Society. Subsequent investigation revealed extensive misconduct: touting, failure to supervise non‑professionals, fraudulent and reckless handling of RAF claims, serious trust account and bookkeeping violations, commingling of funds, failure to account to clients, and failure to comply with multiple provisions of the Attorneys Act. The Law Society applied under s 22(1)(d) of the Attorneys Act to strike the appellants from the roll. The High Court ordered their removal. They appealed, accepting that they were not fit and proper persons but contending that suspension, not striking off, was the appropriate sanction.