The applicant, Mr Oupa Chipane Phaahla, is serving a life sentence. He committed his offence before 1 October 2004 but was sentenced on 5 October 2004, four days after the new parole regime under the Correctional Services Act 111 of 1998 came into force. As a result, he must serve a minimum of 25 years before being eligible for parole, whereas inmates sentenced before 1 October 2004 need serve only 20 years. This distinction arose from sections 136(1) and 73(6)(b)(iv) of the Act, which determine parole eligibility based on date of sentence rather than date of commission of the offence. The applicant challenged these provisions in the High Court, alleging infringement of his constitutional rights to equality (section 9) and to the benefit of the least severe punishment (section 35(3)(n)). The High Court declared the provisions unconstitutional on equality grounds, and the matter came before the Constitutional Court for confirmation of invalidity.