The appellants, husband and wife married in community of property, jointly owned a farm in KwaZulu-Natal. In June 2004 the SAPS discovered that the farm was being used as a large-scale facility for the unlawful manufacture of methaqualone, including drugs, precursor chemicals and laboratory equipment. The National Director of Public Prosecutions obtained a preservation order and later a forfeiture order under Chapter 6 of the Prevention of Organised Crime Act 121 of 1998 (POCA) on the basis that the farm was an instrumentality of a Schedule 1 offence. The first appellant denied knowledge of the criminal activities and relied on the ‘innocent owner’ defence, claiming he had sub-let the farm and rarely visited it. The second appellant did not oppose the forfeiture on the facts, as the NDPP conceded she had no knowledge or reasonable suspicion of the criminal use of the farm. The High Court nevertheless ordered forfeiture of the entire property, holding that her undivided interest in the joint estate could not be separated.